Author
Listed:
- Heather Round
- Jade McKay
- Merle Singer
Abstract
Research suggests that the concept of a “successful leadership” is deeply entrenched in masculine stereotypes. Female leaders are caught in a dichotomy wrestling with characteristics which are considered “masculine” (e.g., confidence, authority, legitimacy, etc.) while characteristics which are considered more “feminine” are perceived to lack the necessary gravitas expected of senior leaders and thus females who embody these might not be considered as strong or as effective in their leadership. Although much research in this area has focused on female leaders struggling to reconcile this dichotomy, in contrast, this paper describes research showing the powerful, agentic way in which female leaders enact gendered leadership. The findings detail emerge from a study which sought to explore the lived leadership experience of 66 females. Drawing on Butlerian theory, the paper explores the idea of performativity in the context of female leadership. Underpinning Butlerian theory is the idea that certain gendered behaviors are not in fact “natural,” and that the learned performance of gendered behavior (i.e., what is commonly associated with femininity and masculinity) is an act of sorts, a performance. The findings show that many female leaders are considered agentive and strategic in adopting a mask and performing “masculine” traits as required in order to be accepted as effective leaders. The findings presented may be helpful for both established and emerging leaders, organizations keen to retain and progress their female leaders, and, more broadly, researchers, practitioners, and academics exploring the intersectionality of leadership, identity, and gender.
Suggested Citation
Heather Round & Jade McKay & Merle Singer, 2025.
"Wearing a “Mask at Work:” The Performativity of Female Leadership in Contemporary Organizations,"
Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(6), pages 2233-2251, November.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:gender:v:32:y:2025:i:6:p:2233-2251
DOI: 10.1111/gwao.70004
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:32:y:2025:i:6:p:2233-2251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.