IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v32y2025i6p2222-2232.html

Carers First, Workers Second: What Graduates in Non‐Graduate School Support Jobs Reveal About Gender, Occupational Choice and Work‐Life Balance

Author

Listed:
  • Abigail Bowling
  • Paul Wakeling

Abstract

This article proposes the care‐giving worker model as the inversion of the “care‐free” worker model in educational and professional work. The care‐giving worker model offers a sociological understanding of how para‐professional jobs may accommodate care‐giving responsibilities both within and outside of work, typically at the expense of occupational status and reward. Rather than representing an alternative route for occupational upgrading—as promoted by policymakers concerned about teacher recruitment—these positions offer an escape from professional/managerial careers which are seen as antithetical to wellbeing. Based on accounts from 26 women and one man who are graduates working in paraprofessional school support positions in England, we show that most participants positioned themselves as carers first and workers second. Many had actively opted out of “care‐free” roles within education and the private sector which they saw as offering no compromise between home and work. This constrained choice arose from a perceived duty to family responsibilities and/or to a feeling that support posts, such as teaching assistant, were a refuge for meaningful educational work. Such a choice meant accepting lower pay and little opportunity for advancement, usually in favor of a partner's career. Our findings suggest that reforms to address managerialism and performativity in teaching could be effective for improving teacher recruitment and teacher and pupil wellbeing.

Suggested Citation

  • Abigail Bowling & Paul Wakeling, 2025. "Carers First, Workers Second: What Graduates in Non‐Graduate School Support Jobs Reveal About Gender, Occupational Choice and Work‐Life Balance," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(6), pages 2222-2232, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:32:y:2025:i:6:p:2222-2232
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.70005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.70005
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.70005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tracey Warren & Gillian Pascall & Elizabeth Fox, 2010. "Gender Equality in Time: Low-Paid Mothers' Paid and Unpaid Work in the UK," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 193-219.
    2. Catherine Hakim, 2003. "A New Approach to Explaining Fertility Patterns: Preference Theory," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 29(3), pages 349-374, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María Davia & Nuria Legazpe, 2015. "Educational attainment and maternity in Spain: not only “when” but also “how”," Review of Economics of the Household, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 871-900, December.
    2. James Raymo & Brienna Perelli-Harris & Sojung Lim & Alicia VanOrman & Miho Iwasawa & Marcia Carlson, 2015. "Educational differences in early childbearing," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 33(3), pages 65-92.
    3. Anna Baranowska-Rataj & Anna Matysiak, 2016. "The Causal Effects of the Number of Children on Female Employment - Do European Institutional and Gender Conditions Matter?," Journal of Labor Research, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 343-367, September.
    4. Joanne S. Muller & Nicole Hiekel & Aart C. Liefbroer, 2020. "The Long-Term Costs of Family Trajectories: Women’s Later-Life Employment and Earnings Across Europe," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(3), pages 1007-1034, June.
    5. Tatiana Karabchuk, 2020. "Job Instability and Fertility Intentions of Young Adults in Europe: Does Labor Market Legislation Matter?," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 688(1), pages 225-245, March.
    6. Rafael Barrera Gutiérrez, 2011. "El vacío institucional en el modelo de elección racional aplicado a la fecundidad," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 13(25), pages 223-248, July-Dece.
    7. Jennifer Whillans, 2025. "Women and the Standard Workweek: Developing a Typology of Work Schedules in the UK," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 39(5), pages 1127-1153, October.
    8. Anna Kurowska & Michal Myck & Katharina Wrohlich, 2012. "Family and Labor Market Choices: Requirements to Guide Effective Evidence-Based Policy," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1234, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    9. Tsung Huang & Tsun-Feng Chiang & Jiun-Nan Pan, 2015. "Fertility and Crime: Evidence from Spatial Analysis of Taiwan," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 319-327, September.
    10. Nicoletta Balbo & Francesco C. Billari & Melinda Mills, 2013. "Fertility in Advanced Societies: A Review of Research," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 29(1), pages 1-38, February.
    11. Arnstein Aassve & Francesco C. Billari & Raffaella Piccarreta, 2007. "Strings of Adulthood: A Sequence Analysis of Young British Women’s Work-Family Trajectories," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 23(3), pages 369-388, October.
    12. Guy Moors, 2008. "The Valued Child. In Search of a Latent Attitude Profile that Influences the Transition to Motherhood," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 24(1), pages 33-57, March.
    13. Brian Buh, 2022. "Which type of employment uncertainty matters when becoming a parent? An analysis by educational attainment in the United Kingdom," VID Working Papers 2201, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna.
    14. Marisa Bucheli & Máximo Rossi, 2016. "Attitudes towards Intimate Partner Violence against Women in Latin America," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 0116, Department of Economics - dECON.
    15. Monika Mynarska & Anna Matysiak, 2010. "Women's determination to combine childbearing and paid employment: How can a qualitative approach help us understand quantitative evidence?," Working Papers 26, Institute of Statistics and Demography, Warsaw School of Economics.
    16. Julia Hellstrand & Jessica Nisén & Mikko Myrskylä, 2022. "Educational field, economic uncertainty, and fertility decline in Finland in 2010–2019," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2022-022, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    17. Lara Tavares, 2008. "Who delays childbearing? The relationships between fertility, education and personality traits," Working Papers 009, "Carlo F. Dondena" Centre for Research on Social Dynamics (DONDENA), Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi.
    18. Dorota Szelewa, 2022. "When Family Policy Doesn’t Work: Motives and Welfare Attitudes Among Childfree Persons in Poland," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 194-205.
    19. Raffaella Piccarreta & Francesco C. Billari, 2007. "Clustering work and family trajectories by using a divisive algorithm," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 170(4), pages 1061-1078, October.
    20. Arnab Bhattacharjee & Cornilius Chikwama & João Lourenço Marques, 2021. "Connections between research and policy: The case of fertility diffusion and regional demographic policy in Portugal," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(3), pages 729-743, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:32:y:2025:i:6:p:2222-2232. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.