IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v32y2025i6p2163-2183.html

Lost in Translation: Exploring Gender Mainstreaming in Japan

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Pianezzi
  • Chieko Inaba

Abstract

This study explores how discourses of gender equality workers in Japan contribute to the construction of gendered subjectivities and how these discourses intersect with the hegemonic neoliberal discourse of gender equality. By employing a thematic and critical discourse analysis, our study revealed the presence of three distinct discursive regimes: a locally adapted neoliberal regime that positions women as resources for development; a critical approach that problematizes a binary view of gender and emphasizes gender equality as a systemic issue; and an essentialist regime that perceives gender equality as incorporating a female perspective and advocates for a more conservative subject position for women in Japan. Expanding on Butler's work, we conclude that discursive displacement can arise within the interaction of various discourse levels, all of which are influenced by the cultural, historical, political, and economic context in which they unfold. We further argue that embracing and recognizing the localized nuances and meanings of gender equality holds the potential to significantly enhance the formulation of both central and local policy decisions. This perspective also opens avenues to effectively counter the effects of neoliberal feminism.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Pianezzi & Chieko Inaba, 2025. "Lost in Translation: Exploring Gender Mainstreaming in Japan," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(6), pages 2163-2183, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:32:y:2025:i:6:p:2163-2183
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.13275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.13275
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.13275?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:32:y:2025:i:6:p:2163-2183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.