IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v32y2025i5p1982-1993.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender and Occupational Prestige. Testing the Devaluation Theory in Spain

Author

Listed:
  • Inmaculada García‐Mainar
  • Pablo García‐Ruiz
  • Víctor M. Montuenga

Abstract

The devaluation theory, that is, that occupations where women predominate become less socially valued than those where men are in the majority, has not reached a unanimous conclusion in the empirical literature, especially when prestige is used as an indicator of the valuation of the occupation. The changing economic and social circumstances may influence the fulfillment of this hypothesis over time. Using regression analysis, this article tests the adequacy of the devaluation theory in the Spanish labor market at two points in time, 1991 and 2013. Previously, it also describes and analyzes whether the ordering of occupations has changed substantially in this period, using two different comparable scales. The results confirm a weakening in the support of the devaluation theory such that gender segregation of occupations does not necessarily imply differences in their social valuation. This result can be attributed to (i) the increase of prestige in some feminized occupations and (ii) the increase of women's participation in prestigious occupations.

Suggested Citation

  • Inmaculada García‐Mainar & Pablo García‐Ruiz & Víctor M. Montuenga, 2025. "Gender and Occupational Prestige. Testing the Devaluation Theory in Spain," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(5), pages 1982-1993, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:32:y:2025:i:5:p:1982-1993
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.13262
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.13262
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.13262?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:32:y:2025:i:5:p:1982-1993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.