Author
Listed:
- Pallavi Banerjee
- Carieta O. Thomas
Abstract
Indian nurses coming to the U.S. on H‐1B visas that tie them to employers are often the breadwinner for spouses and other family members on dependant visas, where the dependant spouses do not have the ability to work due to visa regulations, thus upsetting complex gender dynamics in the household. In this paper, we investigate how Indian immigrant nurses in the U.S. navigate their status as the primary migrant and, family breadwinner with the incessant feminizing discourse of immigrant nurses as selfless healers. The paper is based on in‐depth interviews with 30 Indian migrant nurses and their husbands, 10 immigration experts such as lawyers, legislators and activists, 3 years of ethnography in nursing conferences that Indian nurses in the U.S. attended, and in the homes and churches that the nurses and their families attended. Using the construct of “the caring self” our analysis shows that the nurses are continuously subjected to the discourse of nursing work as healing work in formal and informal contexts such as, by recruitment agencies, at nursing conferences, by superiors and peers at work, in their churches and at home. The internalization of the discourse of immigrant nurses as healers often prevent the nurses from processing and verbalizing their gendered and racialized experiences at work, demands of caregiving at home and the community at large. Nursing work as healing work becomes their path toward making of the caring self in the new country. As such, we argue that immigrant nurses operate in a “migrant care work regime” which is bolstered by the intersections of migration policies and a feminized and racialized discourse of migrant nursing work, creating the trope of the constant care worker that shapes the material realities of nurses as immigrant women care workers in the U.S.
Suggested Citation
Pallavi Banerjee & Carieta O. Thomas, 2025.
"The Migrant Care Work Regime and the Making of the Constant‐Care Worker Among Indian Immigrant Nurses,"
Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(5), pages 1722-1738, September.
Handle:
RePEc:bla:gender:v:32:y:2025:i:5:p:1722-1738
DOI: 10.1111/gwao.13215
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:32:y:2025:i:5:p:1722-1738. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.