IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v32y2025i4p1632-1648.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Education and the Gender Division of Labor in Japan: Trends in Paid and Unpaid Work From 1991 to 2016

Author

Listed:
  • Ekaterina Hertog

Abstract

This paper develops a nuanced understanding of how educational attainment is associated with time allocation trends of Japanese men and women by examining the gendered division of labor in Japan between 1991 and 2016. The analysis reveals that while university‐educated men and women led a slow shift toward greater equality in housework sharing during these years, overall traditional highly gendered patterns persisted. Husbands continued to spend considerably more time on paid work and wives took care of most housework and childcare. There is no evidence for convergence in paid work or childcare for any educational group. In childcare, both men and women across educational groups increased their time investment. Even in families where wives have university education and see themselves primarily as workers, I document only limited shift away from the traditional division of labor between 1991 and 2016. I conclude that the transformation of employment practices in addition to changes in individuals' beliefs and state work–family balance policies may be necessary for a more meaningful social change.

Suggested Citation

  • Ekaterina Hertog, 2025. "Education and the Gender Division of Labor in Japan: Trends in Paid and Unpaid Work From 1991 to 2016," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 1632-1648, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:32:y:2025:i:4:p:1632-1648
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.13242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.13242
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.13242?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:32:y:2025:i:4:p:1632-1648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.