IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v28y2021i2p594-609.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“All are welcome here?”: Navigating race, class, gender, sexual orientation, age, and disability in American feminist coffeehouses of the 1970s and 1980s

Author

Listed:
  • Alex D. Ketchum

Abstract

In the 1970s and 1980s, feminists in the United States began businesses in order to financially support themselves while enacting women's movement politics. Owning and operating a feminist business in a permanent location required large capital investment in order to rent space, buy supplies, and pay workers. Women's, and especially lesbians', social positioning due to discriminatory gender, racial, and sexual orientation laws affected whether or not being able to own a restaurant or store was even possible. Coffeehouses provided an alternative means through which to build feminist communities, with lower initial capital required than restaurants. Feminist coffeehouses in this article will primarily refer to recurring temporary public spaces that served refreshments and provided entertainment. This model of feminist organization expanded participation in some ways; without high fixed costs, coffeehouses enabled women with less money, women from marginalized racial groups, and women with marginalized sexual orientations the ability to create spaces centered on food, drink, and socializing. However, these spaces were not utopic; racism, ageism, trans‐exclusionism, and classism created tension in their respective communities. As coffeehouse organizers tried to address various inequalities, their approach in treating each identity category as discrete often erased women who experienced multiple forms of oppressions simultaneously.

Suggested Citation

  • Alex D. Ketchum, 2021. "“All are welcome here?”: Navigating race, class, gender, sexual orientation, age, and disability in American feminist coffeehouses of the 1970s and 1980s," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 594-609, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:28:y:2021:i:2:p:594-609
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12595
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12595?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:28:y:2021:i:2:p:594-609. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.