IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v26y2019i6p789-804.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘We were fighting for our place’: Resisting gender knowledge regimes through feminist knowledge network formation

Author

Listed:
  • Sally Jones
  • Angela Martinez Dy
  • Natalia Vershinina

Abstract

The transformative potential of feminist knowledge in the disciplines of entrepreneurship, business and management has arguably been hindered by persistent gender knowledge regimes that marginalize feminist scholarship and channel widely applicable gender expertise into niche streams, conferences and publication outlets. Whilst offering valuable spaces for feminist knowledge production, removing gender expertise from mainstream fora reduces its centrality to broader debates, maintaining its marginality and limiting its impact. Taking a collaborative autoethnographic approach, we explore the formation and development of a UK‐based organization for feminist entrepreneurship scholars, the Gender and Enterprise Network, as a means of collective resistance to this perpetuation of enforced marginality. Our network challenges extant gender knowledge regimes and offers transformative opportunities within and outside of our respective organizations, providing insights for others wishing to form similar networks and contributing to ongoing debates on the value and valuing of feminist knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Sally Jones & Angela Martinez Dy & Natalia Vershinina, 2019. "‘We were fighting for our place’: Resisting gender knowledge regimes through feminist knowledge network formation," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(6), pages 789-804, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:26:y:2019:i:6:p:789-804
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12288
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12288?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Udeni Salmon, 2023. "“How did they protect you?” The lived experience of race and gender in the post‐colonial English university," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 510-528, March.
    2. Maria Daskalaki, 2021. "The subversive potential of witchcraft: A reflection on Federici's Self‐reproducing movements," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(4), pages 1643-1660, July.
    3. Ziyu Long & Jasmine R. Linabary & Patrice M. Buzzanell & Ashton Mouton & Ranjani L. Rao, 2020. "Enacting everyday feminist collaborations: Reflexive becoming, proactive improvisation and co‐learning partnerships," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 487-506, July.
    4. Natalia Vershinina & Allan Discua Cruz, 2021. "Researching migrant entrepreneurship communities: a reflection through collaborative (auto)ethnographies," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 507-526, June.
    5. Amal Abdellatif & Maryam Aldossari & Ilaria Boncori & Jamie Callahan & Uracha Chatrakul Na Ayudhya & Sara Chaudhry & Nina Kivinen & Shan‐Jan Sarah Liu & Ea Høg Utoft & Natalia Vershinina & Emily Yarro, 2021. "Breaking the mold: Working through our differences to vocalize the sound of change," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 1956-1979, September.
    6. Natalia Vershinina & Allan Discua Cruz, 2021. "Researching migrant entrepreneurship communities: a reflection through collaborative (auto)ethnographies," Post-Print hal-03275304, HAL.
    7. Omar Manky & Sergio Saravia, 2022. "From pure academics to transformative scholars? The crisis of the “ideal academic” in a Peruvian university," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 971-987, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:26:y:2019:i:6:p:789-804. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.