IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/finrev/v61y2026i1p15-38.html

Female CFOs and Relationship Lending: Implications From Gender Socialization Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Hao
  • Viet Tuan Pham

Abstract

This study examines the impact of CFO gender on the use of relationship lending. Building on gender socialization theory, we hypothesize that female CFOs, driven by communal values and a focus on stakeholder balance, are more inclined to utilize relationship lending to reduce conflicts between creditors and investors. We find that firms with female CFOs exhibit stronger lending relationships, including higher relationship loan frequency and amounts. These findings are robust to various model specifications, including difference‐in‐differences and instrumental variable approaches. Additionally, female CFOs are more likely to maintain borrowing relationships with lenders even after transitioning to different firms, suggesting female CFOs maintain personal relations with lenders. Loan purpose analysis shows that female CFOs avoid using relationship loans for risky activities such as mergers and acquisitions, takeovers, or leveraged buyouts. Collectively, these findings provide new evidence of the role of gender in shaping corporate financial practices and decision‐making.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Hao & Viet Tuan Pham, 2026. "Female CFOs and Relationship Lending: Implications From Gender Socialization Theory," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 61(1), pages 15-38, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:finrev:v:61:y:2026:i:1:p:15-38
    DOI: 10.1111/fire.70007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.70007
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/fire.70007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:finrev:v:61:y:2026:i:1:p:15-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.