IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/finrev/v60y2025i4p1251-1275.html

Dual‐Class Shares and Firm Valuation: Market‐Wide Evidence from Regulatory Events

Author

Listed:
  • Ugur Lel
  • Jeff Netter
  • Annette Poulsen
  • Zhongling Qin

Abstract

The motivations and impacts of dual‐class voting structures are controversial and have been extensively studied. In this paper, we apply a new methodology to study the impact of dual‐class voting that avoids the endogeneity issues of other studies. Specifically, we rely on market‐wide stock market reactions to multiple regulatory events to show that risk‐adjusted stock returns rise (fall) in response to events that decrease (increase) the probability of adopting dual‐class shares. Across firms, this reaction varies systematically and sensibly with proxies for managerial flexibility or entrenchment and overall suggests that investors favor dual‐class shares in research‐intensive and well‐governed firms. The improved method of analysis strengthens the results of prior studies and reconciles the theories of managerial flexibility versus entrenchment. We conclude by arguing that a one‐size‐fits‐all policy that bans dual‐class shares would reduce research output, firm value, and profitability.

Suggested Citation

  • Ugur Lel & Jeff Netter & Annette Poulsen & Zhongling Qin, 2025. "Dual‐Class Shares and Firm Valuation: Market‐Wide Evidence from Regulatory Events," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 60(4), pages 1251-1275, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:finrev:v:60:y:2025:i:4:p:1251-1275
    DOI: 10.1111/fire.12446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.12446
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/fire.12446?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stein, Jeremy C, 1988. "Takeover Threats and Managerial Myopia," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 96(1), pages 61-80, February.
    2. Ang, Andrew & Liu, Jun & Schwarz, Krista, 2020. "Using Stocks or Portfolios in Tests of Factor Models," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 55(3), pages 709-750, May.
    3. Carhart, Mark M, 1997. "On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 52(1), pages 57-82, March.
    4. Xu, Ting, 2021. "Do Excess Control Rights Benefit Creditors? Evidence from Dual-Class Firms," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 56(3), pages 821-852, May.
    5. Johnson, William C. & Karpoff, Jonathan M. & Yi, Sangho, 2015. "The bonding hypothesis of takeover defenses: Evidence from IPO firms," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 307-332.
    6. Donelli, Marcelo & Larrain, Borja & Francisco Urzúa, I., 2013. "Ownership Dynamics with Large Shareholders: An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 48(2), pages 579-609, April.
    7. Yermack, David, 1996. "Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 185-211, February.
    8. Field, Laura Casares & Lowry, Michelle, 2022. "Bucking the trend: Why do IPOs choose controversial governance structures and why do investors let them?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 27-54.
    9. Malatesta, Paul H., 1986. "Measuring Abnormal Performance: The Event Parameter Approach Using Joint Generalized Least Squares," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(1), pages 27-38, March.
    10. Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert W, 1986. "Large Shareholders and Corporate Control," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 94(3), pages 461-488, June.
    11. Caspar Rose, 2007. "Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 404-413, March.
    12. John J. Binder, 1985. "Measuring the Effects of Regulation with Stock Price Data," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 16(2), pages 167-183, Summer.
    13. He, Jie (Jack) & Tian, Xuan, 2013. "The dark side of analyst coverage: The case of innovation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(3), pages 856-878.
    14. James S. Linck & Jeffry M. Netter & Tina Yang, 2009. "The Effects and Unintended Consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on the Supply and Demand for Directors," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(8), pages 3287-3328, August.
    15. Jeffry Netter & Mike Stegemoller & M. Babajide Wintoki, 2011. "Implications of Data Screens on Merger and Acquisition Analysis: A Large Sample Study of Mergers and Acquisitions from 1992 to 2009," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 24(7), pages 2316-2357.
    16. Chemmanur, Thomas J. & Jiao, Yawen, 2012. "Dual class IPOs: A theoretical analysis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 305-319.
    17. Chemmanur, Thomas J. & Tian, Xuan, 2018. "Do Antitakeover Provisions Spur Corporate Innovation? A Regression Discontinuity Analysis," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 53(3), pages 1163-1194, June.
    18. Schwert, G William, 1981. "Using Financial Data to Measure Effects of Regulation," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 24(1), pages 121-158, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. de La Bruslerie, Hubert, 2026. "Dual class shares design in corporate firms: An endogenous governance model of the optimal “wedge”," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    2. Qiu, Yueyang & Yin, Xuebao & Hu, Nan, 2026. "Blockchain Investment, dual-class share structure, and asset pricing efficiency," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Miao & He, Meng & Wang, Aoran, 2024. "Concerted action agreements, corporate innovation, and financial market outcomes: A pre-registered report," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    2. Drobetz, W. & Momtaz, Paul P., 2020. "Antitakeover Provisions and Firm Value: New Evidence from the M&A Market," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    3. Cremers, K.J. Martijn & Litov, Lubomir P. & Sepe, Simone M., 2017. "Staggered boards and long-term firm value, revisited," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(2), pages 422-444.
    4. Gao, Lei & Jiang, Christine X. & Mekhaimer, Mohamed, 2023. "Count on subordinate executives: Internal governance and innovation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    5. Guernsey, Scott & Sepe, Simone M. & Serfling, Matthew, 2022. "Blood in the water: The value of antitakeover provisions during market shocks," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(3), pages 1070-1096.
    6. Chen, Sheng-Syan & Hsu, Ching-Yu & Huang, Chia-Wei, 2016. "The white squire defense: Evidence from private investments in public equity," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 16-35.
    7. Carline, Nicholas F. & Gogineni, Sridhar, 2021. "Antitakeover provisions and investment in mergers and acquisitions: A causal reevaluation," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    8. D. Daniel Keum, 2021. "Innovation, short‐termism, and the cost of strong corporate governance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 3-29, January.
    9. Caroline Flammer & Michael W. Toffel & Kala Viswanathan, 2021. "Shareholder activism and firms' voluntary disclosure of climate change risks," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(10), pages 1850-1879, October.
    10. Saurav Roychoudhury & Anuj Bhowmik & Srobonti Chattopadhyay, 2024. "Innovation and governance," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 48(1), pages 78-106, March.
    11. Estévez-Mendoza, Carlos & Montoro-Sánchez, Ángeles, 2024. "Exploring the relationship between innovation and corporate governance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    12. Cao, Xiaping & Leng, Tiecheng & Goh, Jeremy & Malatesta, Paul, 2020. "The innovation effect of dual-class shares: New evidence from US firms," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 347-357.
    13. Cheng, Xiaoyan & Mpundu, Heminigild & Wan, Huishan, 2020. "Investment efficiency: Dual-class vs. Single-class firms," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    14. Peter M. Clarkson & Allen Craswell & Prue Mackenzie, 2008. "The Effect of Board Independence on Target Shareholder Wealth," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 18(2), pages 135-148, June.
    15. Elijah Brewer & Hesna Genay & William C. Hunter & George G. Kaufman, 1999. "Does the Japanese stock market price bank risk? evidence from financial firm failures," Working Paper Series WP-99-31, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    16. Wintoki, M. Babajide, 2007. "Corporate boards and regulation: The effect of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the exchange listing requirements on firm value," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 13(2-3), pages 229-250, June.
    17. Atawnah, Nader & Eshraghi, Arman & Baghdadi, Ghasan A. & Bhatti, Ishaq, 2024. "Managerial ability and firm value: A new perspective," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).
    18. de La Bruslerie, Hubert, 2025. "News flow as a determinant of the voting premium of dual-class shares," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    19. Amitava Roy, 2014. "Corporate Governance and Firm Performance: An Exploratory Analysis of Indian Listed Companies," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 3(1-2), pages 93-120, June.
    20. Ahmed Bouteska & Mehdi Mili, 2022. "Does corporate governance affect financial analysts’ stock recommendations, target prices accuracy and earnings forecast characteristics? An empirical investigation of US companies," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(4), pages 2125-2171, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:finrev:v:60:y:2025:i:4:p:1251-1275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/efaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.