IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/finrev/v30y1995i4p663-83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Sampling Errors on the Choice of Portfolio Efficiency Analysis Rules with Borrowing and Lending of a Riskless Asset

Author

Listed:
  • Brooks, Robert
  • Kroll, Yoram

Abstract

This paper evaluates the impact of sampling errors on portfolio decisions using mean-variance and stochastic dominance rules where riskless borrowing and lending opportunities exist. The paper establishes criteria for comparing the alternative decision rules (for example, mean variance versus stochastic dominance) according to their effectiveness and the cost (in sampling error terms). Normal distributions are simulated using various assumed means, standard deviations, correlations, and sample sizes. These simulations enable one to evaluate the impact of sampling errors on the potential effectiveness of the empirical stochastic dominance and mean variance rules that include borrowing and lending of a riskless asset. Copyright 1995 by MIT Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Brooks, Robert & Kroll, Yoram, 1995. "The Impact of Sampling Errors on the Choice of Portfolio Efficiency Analysis Rules with Borrowing and Lending of a Riskless Asset," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 30(4), pages 663-683, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:finrev:v:30:y:1995:i:4:p:663-83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roger Best & Ronald Best & James Yoder, 2000. "Value stocks and market efficiency," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 24(1), pages 28-35, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:finrev:v:30:y:1995:i:4:p:663-83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley Content Delivery). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/efaaaea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.