IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ehsrev/v79y2026i4p1579-1607.html

Chasing the perfida Albione: Anglo‐Italian productivity gap in the late 1930s

Author

Listed:
  • Tancredi Salamone

Abstract

This paper presents new estimates of Anglo‐Italian labour productivity levels in manufacturing in the late 1930s, derived using the standard single‐deflation approach. The findings confirm a substantial productivity gap between Italy and the United Kingdom at the aggregate level, alongside pronounced intersectoral heterogeneity. Italy appears relatively competitive in textiles and, to a lesser extent, in iron and steel and in chemicals. Preliminary estimates using the more advanced double‐deflation methodology, as well as tentative measures of productivity per hour worked, suggest that single‐deflation figures may represent a lower‐bound estimate. Nevertheless, the productivity gap remains large when benchmarked against other industrialized economies, lending support to a more pessimistic interpretation of the Fascist period in terms of labour productivity performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Tancredi Salamone, 2026. "Chasing the perfida Albione: Anglo‐Italian productivity gap in the late 1930s," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 79(4), pages 1579-1607, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:79:y:2026:i:4:p:1579-1607
    DOI: 10.1111/ehr.70071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.70071
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ehr.70071?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:79:y:2026:i:4:p:1579-1607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.