IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ehsrev/v79y2026i3p1024-1051.html

Felons’ chattels and English living standards in the later fourteenth and fifteenth centuries

Author

Listed:
  • Chris Briggs
  • Ben Jervis
  • Alice Forward
  • Tomasz Gromelski
  • Matthew Tompkins

Abstract

The later fourteenth and fifteenth centuries have long occupied an intriguing and contested place in discussions of England's long‐run economic development. One key issue around which debate has coalesced is the living standards of the population as a whole and of different groups within it. We contribute to this debate by bringing forward new evidence on the material living standards of peasants, artisans, and wage‐earners in the countryside and small towns. This consists of lists of goods and chattels forfeited to the crown by felons, fugitives, and outlaws. This material, found in the archive of the royal escheator, is not without its problems. Yet, a careful quantitative analysis of both the overall valuations of forfeited goods and the incidence of specific items in such lists of forfeitures shows that there was relatively little change in the later fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. This is surprising, given the traditional characterization of this period as a time of rising consumption during the ‘golden age of the labourer’. This later medieval evidence is contextualized through the analysis of similar forfeiture data relating to the sixteenth century.

Suggested Citation

  • Chris Briggs & Ben Jervis & Alice Forward & Tomasz Gromelski & Matthew Tompkins, 2026. "Felons’ chattels and English living standards in the later fourteenth and fifteenth centuries," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 79(3), pages 1024-1051, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:79:y:2026:i:3:p:1024-1051
    DOI: 10.1111/ehr.70052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.70052
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ehr.70052?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:79:y:2026:i:3:p:1024-1051. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.