IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ehsrev/v78y2025i3p952-974.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The failed promise of freedom—Emancipation and wealth inequality in the Caribbean

Author

Listed:
  • Dimitrios Theodoridis
  • Klas Rönnbäck
  • Stefania Galli

Abstract

Was there any redistribution of resources in the Caribbean societies after emancipation from slavery? What were formerly enslaved persons’ prospects to improve their socio‐economic status like after emancipation? To shed some light on these questions, this paper provides unique empirical evidence on patterns of wealth inequality before and after emancipation for the island of St. Croix, a typical slavery‐based sugar island in the Caribbean. Our findings suggest that there was no decrease in inequality following the institutional break of emancipation. A key explanation, we argue, rests on factor endowments and more specifically on the restrictive land–labour ratios that prevailed on several Caribbean islands such as St. Croix. Due to these factor endowments, formerly enslaved persons remained unable to accumulate any substantial amounts of wealth for decades after emancipation.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimitrios Theodoridis & Klas Rönnbäck & Stefania Galli, 2025. "The failed promise of freedom—Emancipation and wealth inequality in the Caribbean," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 78(3), pages 952-974, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:78:y:2025:i:3:p:952-974
    DOI: 10.1111/ehr.13386
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.13386
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ehr.13386?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:78:y:2025:i:3:p:952-974. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.