IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ehsrev/v73y2020i1p258-280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘The capital market is dead’: the difficult birth of index‐linked gilts in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Michael J. Oliver
  • Janette Rutterford

Abstract

This article describes how and why the Thatcher government introduced index‐linked gilts in 1981. It outlines the earlier deliberations by the monetary authorities during the 1950s and 1960s on how an indexed government security might help or hinder the fight against inflation. Although these discussions came to nothing, rising inflation and increasing difficulties with managing the gilt‐edged market during the 1970s revived interest in the indexation of government securities. Both the Page Commission in 1974 and the Wilson Report in 1980 recommended the introduction of inflation‐indexed securities, but the election of the Conservative government in 1979 gave real momentum to their possible issuance. Although Margaret Thatcher was initially opposed to indexation, Nigel Lawson galvanized the Treasury and the Bank of England to work on a scheme to issue index‐linked gilts as a means of improving economic performance. The article traces the contentious series of discussions surrounding the possible effects of index‐linked gilts on government debt interest costs, on monetary policy and monetary targets, and on the possible ‘crowding out’ of corporate bonds and equities which could not offer a guaranteed real return. Despite teething problems, the introduction of inflation‐linked bonds in the UK was deemed a success.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael J. Oliver & Janette Rutterford, 2020. "‘The capital market is dead’: the difficult birth of index‐linked gilts in the UK," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 73(1), pages 258-280, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:73:y:2020:i:1:p:258-280
    DOI: 10.1111/ehr.12875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ehr.12875
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ehr.12875?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ehsrev:v:73:y:2020:i:1:p:258-280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ehsukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.