IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecopol/v38y2026i1p142-156.html

How Do Investors Respond to Data Asset Disclosure: Evidence From China

Author

Listed:
  • Yibo Huang
  • Zhuoran Wang
  • Huili Zhang

Abstract

Data have become increasingly important in almost all aspects of society, including government, business, finance, and education. This study examines stock market reactions to the publication of formal regulations on the accounting treatment of data assets, which, among other things, specifies the accounting treatment related to corporate data resources and boosts the disclosure of related accounting information. We document that firms with higher data asset potential receive more positive market reactions to the regulations than those with lower data asset potential. Heterogeneity analyses suggest that the positive market reactions are concentrated in firms with technological attribute, higher technological factor intensity, and stronger market position. In addition, we observe that stronger external monitoring, higher stock liquidity, and better information disclosure amplify the positive market reactions. Overall, our findings provide systematic evidence of positive market reactions following data assets regulations and shed light on relevant policy‐making and regulatory processes, which may be extrapolated to other emerging countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Yibo Huang & Zhuoran Wang & Huili Zhang, 2026. "How Do Investors Respond to Data Asset Disclosure: Evidence From China," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(1), pages 142-156, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:38:y:2026:i:1:p:142-156
    DOI: 10.1111/ecpo.70017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.70017
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecpo.70017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:38:y:2026:i:1:p:142-156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0954-1985 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.