IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecopol/v37y2025i2p735-751.html

The Peer Effect of Key Audit Matter Disclosure: Evidence From China

Author

Listed:
  • Xuegang Cui
  • Jia Xu
  • Yiyuan Sun

Abstract

This study examines whether the disclosure of the Key Audit Matters (KAMs) has a peer effect within an industry. Using a sample of China‐listed firms from 2017 to 2022, we find a significant industry‐specific peer effect in the KAM disclosure behavior, which remains consistent across various robustness tests. The peer effect of the KAM disclosure is more substantial when corporate market competition is more fierce. Specifically, the cut‐throat competition leads to higher auditing risk for auditors who have to alleviate the risk by imitating the KAM disclosure behavior of their peers within the same industry, thereby leading to a peer effect in KAM disclosure. Heterogeneity analysis exhibits that the extent of peer effect in the KAM disclosure varies among corporate ownership structure, auditor expertise, and media coverage. This study contributes to the literature on the KAM disclosure and offers important policy implications for auditing standard construction and regulation on KAM disclosure.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuegang Cui & Jia Xu & Yiyuan Sun, 2025. "The Peer Effect of Key Audit Matter Disclosure: Evidence From China," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 735-751, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:37:y:2025:i:2:p:735-751
    DOI: 10.1111/ecpo.12340
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12340
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecpo.12340?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lennox, Clive & Wang, Zi-Tian & Wu, Xi, 2018. "Earnings management, audit adjustments, and the financing of corporate acquisitions: Evidence from China," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 21-40.
    2. Jere R. Francis & Paul N. Michas & Scott E. Seavey, 2013. "Does Audit Market Concentration Harm the Quality of Audited Earnings? Evidence from Audit Markets in 42 Countries," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 325-355, March.
    3. Xiaoqiang Zhi & Zuming Kang, 2021. "Critical audit matters and stock price crash risk," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, December.
    4. Mark T. Leary & Michael R. Roberts, 2014. "Do Peer Firms Affect Corporate Financial Policy?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(1), pages 139-178, February.
    5. Charles F. Manski, 1993. "Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 60(3), pages 531-542.
    6. Asad Ali Rind & Saeed Akbar & Sabri Boubaker & Souad Lajili Jarjir & Sabur Mollah, 2021. "The Role of Peer Effects in Corporate Employee Welfare Policies," Post-Print hal-03241471, HAL.
    7. Clive S. Lennox & Jaime J. Schmidt & Anne M. Thompson, 2023. "Why are expanded audit reports not informative to investors? Evidence from the United Kingdom," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 497-532, June.
    8. Pouyan Foroughi & Alan J Marcus & Vinh Nguyen & Hassan Tehranian, 2022. "Peer Effects in Corporate Governance Practices: Evidence from Universal Demand Laws," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 35(1), pages 132-167.
    9. Grennan, Jillian, 2019. "Dividend payments as a response to peer influence," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(3), pages 549-570.
    10. Mikko Zerni, 2012. "Audit Partner Specialization and Audit Fees: Some Evidence from Sweden," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 312-340, March.
    11. Mahmoud Elmarzouky & Khaled Hussainey & Tarek Abdelfattah & Atm Enayet Karim, 2022. "Corporate risk disclosure and key audit matters: the egocentric theory," International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(2), pages 230-251, March.
    12. Hui Liu & Jiaqi Ning & Yue Zhang & Junrui Zhang, 2022. "Key audit matters and debt contracting: evidence from China," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(6), pages 657-678, June.
    13. Machokoto, Michael & Chipeta, Chimwemwe & Ibeji, Ngozi, 2021. "The institutional determinants of peer effects on corporate cash holdings," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    14. Seo, Hojun, 2021. "Peer effects in corporate disclosure decisions," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1).
    15. Li, Junbao & Shi, Zhanzhong & He, Chengying & Lv, Chengshuang, 2023. "Peer effects on corporate R&D investment policies: A spatial panel model approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    16. Thanyawee Pratoomsuwan & Orapan Yolrabil, 2020. "Key audit matter and auditor liability: evidence from auditor evaluators in Thailand," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 21(4), pages 741-762, June.
    17. Im, Hyun Joong & Liu, Jia & Park, Young Joon, 2021. "Policy uncertainty and peer effects: Evidence from corporate investment in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    18. Bae, Kee-Hong & Stulz, René M. & Tan, Hongping, 2008. "Do local analysts know more? A cross-country study of the performance of local analysts and foreign analysts," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 581-606, June.
    19. repec:eme:jaar00:jaar-10-2019-0147 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Ling Tuo & Ji Yu & Yu Zhang, 2020. "How do industry peers influence individual firms’ voluntary disclosure strategies?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 54(3), pages 911-956, April.
    21. repec:eme:maj000:maj-06-2021-3210 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shijun Huang & Pengcheng Du & Yu Hong & Woran Wu, 2024. "Are corporate environmental, social, and governance practices contagious? The peer-effect perspective," Energy & Environment, , vol. 35(8), pages 4049-4082, December.
    2. Zhu, Yanli & Yin, Li & Lu, Xueyan, 2024. "Peer effects with multifaceted network dependence structures in R&D investment decisions: Evidence from Chinese listed firms," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PA).
    3. Chahine, Salim & Daher, Mai, 2025. "Do portfolio companies learn from their peers? Evidence from venture capital funding," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    4. Chien Chi Chu & Xiu‐Fen Su & Yu‐En Lin & Akihiro Omura & Bin Li & Adrian Wai‐Kong Cheung, 2023. "Love thy neighbour: Evidence from capital structure decisions," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(3), pages 2907-2933, September.
    5. Li, Junbao & Shi, Zhanzhong & He, Chengying & Lv, Chengshuang, 2023. "Peer effects on corporate R&D investment policies: A spatial panel model approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    6. Ali-Rind, Asad & Boubaker, Sabri & Jarjir, Souad Lajili, 2023. "Peer effects in financial economics: A literature survey," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    7. Su, Zhifang & Wang, Luhan & Liao, Jing & Cui, Xin, 2023. "Peer effects in corporate advertisement expenditure: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    8. Jiali Liu & Xinran Xie & Yu Duan & Liang Tang, 2023. "Peer effects and the mechanisms in corporate capital structure: evidence from Chinese listed firms," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 14(1), pages 295-326, March.
    9. Xiaoxu Zhang & Xinyu Du, 2023. "Industry and Regional Peer Effects in Corporate Digital Transformation: The Moderating Effects of TMT Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-22, March.
    10. Luo, Xiang & Luo, Yi & Zhou, Jianan, 2025. "The communicative value of key audit matters in M&As: The effect of performance commitments," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2).
    11. Bao, Yangming & Goetz, Martin R., 2026. "Local peer effects and corporate investment," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    12. Aghamolla, Cyrus & Thakor, Richard T., 2022. "IPO peer effects," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 206-226.
    13. Zhuang, Yuan & Nie, Jing & Wu, Weixing, 2022. "Peer influence and the value of cash holdings," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 265-284.
    14. Fu, Zheng & Ma, Yechi & Li, Suyang & Qiao, Lu, 2023. "Peer performance and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings recognition," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    15. Panagiotis Karavitis & Pantelis Kazakis & Tianyue Xu, 2022. "CFO Working Experience and Tax Avoidance," Working Papers 2022_14, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
    16. Cave, Joshua & Lancheros, Sandra, 2024. "Local peer influence on dividend payout decisions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    17. Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez & Valentina Minutiello & Patrizia Tettamanzi, 2022. "Gender disclosure: The impact of peer behaviour and the firm's equality policies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 385-405, March.
    18. Bao, Yangming & Götz, Martin, 2025. "Local peer effects and corporate investment," Discussion Papers 34/2025, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    19. Wang, Shaolin & Wang, Jianli & Dong, Minghua & Li, Jingyuan, 2026. "Peer effects of corporate ESG practice: Incorporating the impact of ESG rating disagreement," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    20. Barrachina-Fernández, Lucía & Sogorb-Mira, Francisco, 2024. "The influence of peer effects, commodity prices and its hedging on corporate capital structure: Evidence from the oil and gas industry," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:37:y:2025:i:2:p:735-751. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0954-1985 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.