IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecopol/v37y2025i2p669-684.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Tax‐Aggressive Behavior Motivate More CSR Engagement?

Author

Listed:
  • Xin Wang
  • Kam Fong Chan
  • Millicent Chang
  • Yuan George Shan
  • Joey W. Yang

Abstract

Using an international sample of listed companies from 36 countries, we investigate whether firms' engagement in tax‐aggressive behavior drives them to increase their corporate social responsibility (CSR) and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) activities. Consistent with the reputation risk mitigation theory, our results show that U.S. and Canadian firms ramp up their ESG activities 4 years after engaging in tax‐aggressive practices, aligning with the typical duration for the IRS (Internal Revenue Service) investigations. In contrast, firms in other countries act sooner, within 2–3 years. Further analysis shows that firms in countries with stringent law enforcement, and those adopting International Financial Reporting Standards, are less likely to enhance CSR/ESG activities following aggressive tax policies. These findings highlight the significant influence of regulatory and disclosure environments in shaping corporate behavior in tax policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Xin Wang & Kam Fong Chan & Millicent Chang & Yuan George Shan & Joey W. Yang, 2025. "Does Tax‐Aggressive Behavior Motivate More CSR Engagement?," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 669-684, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:37:y:2025:i:2:p:669-684
    DOI: 10.1111/ecpo.12333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecpo.12333
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecpo.12333?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecopol:v:37:y:2025:i:2:p:669-684. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0954-1985 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.