IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/econpa/v33y2014i2p115-122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Closure of Melbourne's North–South Pipeline: A Case of Hydraulic Autarky

Author

Listed:
  • Lin Crase
  • Nicholas Pawsey
  • Bethany Cooper

Abstract

type="main" xml:id="ecpa12076-abs-0001"> This paper considers the current status of the water held on behalf of Melburnians that was to have been delivered via the north–south pipeline that connects irrigation areas in northern Victoria with metropolitan Melbourne. We focus on the political decision to now limit the use of this water and the impacts on current water customers. Attention is also given to the longer-term consequences and how excising the option of low-cost access to water via the pipeline is shaping water planning for Melbourne. We conclude that the lack of transparency on these matters undermines the so-called cost-effectiveness analysis being offered to support future water plans.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin Crase & Nicholas Pawsey & Bethany Cooper, 2014. "The Closure of Melbourne's North–South Pipeline: A Case of Hydraulic Autarky," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 33(2), pages 115-122, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:econpa:v:33:y:2014:i:2:p:115-122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/ecpa.2014.33.issue-2
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lin Crase & Bethany Cooper, 2017. "The Political Economy of Drought: Legacy and Lessons from Australia's Millennium Drought," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 36(3), pages 289-299, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:econpa:v:33:y:2014:i:2:p:115-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esausea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.