IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/econom/v92y2025i368p1231-1246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing mixed strategies in the field: an experiment with soccer penalty kicks

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Sentana

Abstract

I conduct a (quasi) field experiment in the soccer field with junior players to study if non‐professionals satisfy the implications of mixed strategy equilibrium when repeatedly facing the same opponents in the penalty kick game. By having repeated observations on different pairs of soccer players, a rare situation in real life, I can not only deal with the heterogeneity of the optimal strategies across pairs of players, but also study possible interactions between the actions of the players. My empirical results are consistent with the theory, even though the least experienced goalkeepers tend to replicate each other's actions. Interestingly, when all pairs are erroneously treated as a homogeneous one, I find rejections of the equilibrium implications, highlighting the importance of heterogeneity for determining mixed strategy play at the non‐professional level.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Sentana, 2025. "Testing mixed strategies in the field: an experiment with soccer penalty kicks," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 92(368), pages 1231-1246, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:econom:v:92:y:2025:i:368:p:1231-1246
    DOI: 10.1111/ecca.70002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.70002
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecca.70002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:econom:v:92:y:2025:i:368:p:1231-1246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.