IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/econom/v87y2020i345p52-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exponential‐growth Bias in Experimental Consumption Decisions

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew R. Levy
  • Joshua Tasoff

Abstract

Exponential‐growth bias (EGB) is the tendency to neglect the power of compounding interest, which has been found to be widespread in the population. A person with EGB will misperceive the intertemporal budget constraint, overestimating lifetime wealth and underestimating the differences in the cost of consumption across periods. We test five comparative static predictions implied by EGB: (1) compound interest will increase consumption when the elasticity of intertemporal substitution is greater than 1; (2) higher interest rates lead to more compounding and hence increase consumption; (3) budget‐neutral delays in income will increase consumption; (4) the person will exhibit a form of dynamic inconsistency that depends solely on the current account balance and is independent of time preferences; and (5) framing the frequency of interest in shorter units increases consumption. We test these predictions using an induced‐value consumption–savings experiment in the laboratory, and find evidence in support of all predictions against the rational benchmark. We consider rules of thumb as alternative hypotheses and find that they cannot explain the results, although they contribute to some findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew R. Levy & Joshua Tasoff, 2020. "Exponential‐growth Bias in Experimental Consumption Decisions," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 87(345), pages 52-80, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:econom:v:87:y:2020:i:345:p:52-80
    DOI: 10.1111/ecca.12306
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecca.12306
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecca.12306?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bachmann, Kremena & Lot, Andre & Xu, Xiaogeng & Hens, Thorsten, 2023. "Experimental Research on Retirement Decision-Making: Evidence from Replications," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:econom:v:87:y:2020:i:345:p:52-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lsepsuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.