IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecnote/v44y2015i1p29-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hedge Accounting and Risk Management: An Advanced Prospective Model for Testing Hedge Effectiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Annalisa Di Clemente

Abstract

type="main"> In this work we propose a new prospective model for testing the economic hedge effectiveness. Our model is derived from the initial approach based on the measure of the relative risk reduction (RRR) where the risk is expressed by the standard deviation and a Normal world is assumed. Differently, our model estimates the RRR produced by the hedging strategy in terms of the new risk measures of the value at risk (VaR) and the expected shortfall (ES). Moreover, it fails the traditional hypothesis of a normal distribution for the risk factors generating their return scenarios by Monte Carlo simulation. Because the main hedging issue especially for financial institutions is the portfolio hedging, our model has been implemented to a market risk hedging strategy, the cross hedging, realized by combining a stock index future (short position) with a stock portfolio (long position). We underline that, while our results present a strong significance from an economic viewpoint, they may be utilized only in an experimental way for hedge accounting purposes.

Suggested Citation

  • Annalisa Di Clemente, 2015. "Hedge Accounting and Risk Management: An Advanced Prospective Model for Testing Hedge Effectiveness," Economic Notes, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, vol. 44(1), pages 29-55, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecnote:v:44:y:2015:i:1:p:29-55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecnote:v:44:y:2015:i:1:p:29-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0391-5026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.