IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecnote/v30y2001i3p457-489.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analytical and Empirical Features of Internal Ratings: An Empirical Consistency Test based on Statistical Models

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Resti
  • Cristina Omacini

Abstract

type="main" xml:lang="en"> Internal ratings represent an important input to the new generation of ‘credit portfolio models’ and to the new capital requirements proposed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision; however, their reliability must be validated. In this paper, we first recall the main theoretical and practical aspects explaining the relevance gained by internal ratings in the banks’ operating practices and in the current reform proposals on bank capital regulation. We then show how some statistical models can be used to evaluate a rating system when no great amount on past data is available. To this goal, we first set up a binomial model to capture the main drivers of a borrower’s default; then, we build a separate multinomial model to ‘clone’ the judgements issued by human experts. Finally, we compare the two models: the degree of consistency between them looks reasonable, but is far from being perfect. The main causes of these disagreements are analysed, and some improvements of the current rating process are proposed. (J.E.L. G290, C250)

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Resti & Cristina Omacini, 2001. "Analytical and Empirical Features of Internal Ratings: An Empirical Consistency Test based on Statistical Models," Economic Notes, Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA, vol. 30(3), pages 457-489, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecnote:v:30:y:2001:i:3:p:457-489
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1468-0300.00067
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecnote:v:30:y:2001:i:3:p:457-489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0391-5026 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.