IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/ecaffa/v46y2026i1p41-58.html

The government–robber comparison: A long‐standing tradition beyond avowed libertarianism

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Mandeville

Abstract

A government differs from a robber, but they share the common feature of initiating coercion. This similarity has been noticed by libertarians as well as within a distinct scholarly tradition and as a recurring theme throughout Western philosophy. Twentieth‐century political economists have employed this comparison to understand state formation and institutional behaviour. Philosophers from ancient Greece to the Enlightenment have recognised the fundamental similarities between governmental and criminal coercion in the context of examining questions of legitimacy and justice. The government–robber comparison has been an analytical tool of accepted standing throughout Western intellectual history that deserves contemporary consideration.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Mandeville, 2026. "The government–robber comparison: A long‐standing tradition beyond avowed libertarianism," Economic Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(1), pages 41-58, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:ecaffa:v:46:y:2026:i:1:p:41-58
    DOI: 10.1111/ecaf.70020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/ecaf.70020
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/ecaf.70020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:ecaffa:v:46:y:2026:i:1:p:41-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0265-0665 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.