IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v44y2026i2ne70060.html

Aligning development and climate goals: The role of poverty in household mitigation strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Nkechi S. Owoo

Abstract

Motivation Climate change remains one of the most pressing global challenges, one which is driven largely by human activity. While countries, including Ghana, have made commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the impacts of global warming are already being felt. For many low‐income populations, particularly those facing multiple deprivations, climate action may not be a priority. Understanding how poverty in its various dimensions intersects with household‐level climate mitigation is crucial for designing inclusive environmental and development policies. Purpose This study explores the relationship between multidimensional poverty and climate mitigation behaviours in Ghana. It seeks to answer the following questions: (1) How does multidimensional poverty affect the likelihood of adopting climate mitigation strategies at the household level? (2) Are there gender and locational differences in climate action among poor households? Approach and Methods The study uses nationally representative panel data for Ghana. A multidimensional poverty index (MDPI) is constructed based on indicators defined by the Ghana Statistical Service and the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI). A correlated random‐effects (CRE) probit model is applied to examine the link between poverty and household‐level climate mitigation behaviours. Findings Households headed by males and those in urban areas are more likely to adopt clean, mitigative strategies. In contrast, multidimensional poverty is consistently associated with a lower likelihood of climate mitigation. Deprivation in areas such as health, education and living standards may push climate concerns down household priority lists. However, poor households in urban areas are more likely to engage in climate mitigation than their rural counterparts, suggesting a locational advantage. Policy Implications Effective climate policies must account for social and spatial inequalities. Integrating poverty reduction with climate action, especially through improved access to basic services, can enhance the adoption of mitigation strategies, ensuring no one is left behind in the climate transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Nkechi S. Owoo, 2026. "Aligning development and climate goals: The role of poverty in household mitigation strategies," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 44(2), March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:44:y:2026:i:2:n:e70060
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.70060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.70060
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.70060?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nicolas Taconet & Aurélie Méjean & Céline Guivarch, 2020. "Influence of climate change impacts and mitigation costs on inequality between countries," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 160(1), pages 15-34, May.
    2. Nuttakrij Apipuchayakul & Sujitra Vassanadumrongdee, 2020. "Factors Affecting the Consumption of Energy-Efficient Lighting Products: Exploring Purchase Behaviors of Thai Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    3. Eakin, Hallie, 2005. "Institutional change, climate risk, and rural vulnerability: Cases from Central Mexico," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(11), pages 1923-1938, November.
    4. Gintare Stankuniene & Dalia Streimikiene & Grigorios L. Kyriakopoulos, 2020. "Systematic Literature Review on Behavioral Barriers of Climate Change Mitigation in Households," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Ojo, T.O. & Baiyegunhi, L.J.S., 2020. "Determinants of climate change adaptation strategies and its impact on the net farm income of rice farmers in south-west Nigeria," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    6. Rahut, Dil Bahadur & Das, Sukanya & De Groote, Hugo & Behera, Bhagirath, 2014. "Determinants of household energy use in Bhutan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 661-672.
    7. Ebrima Sonko & Wojciech J. Florkowski & Sampson Agodzo & Philip Antwi-Agyei, 2020. "Subsistence farmer knowledge of strategies alleviating food insecurity in the context of climate change in the lower river region of the Gambia," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(3), pages 607-624, June.
    8. Troncoso, Karin & Castillo, Alicia & Masera, Omar & Merino, Leticia, 2007. "Social perceptions about a technological innovation for fuelwood cooking: Case study in rural Mexico," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2799-2810, May.
    9. Owoo, Nkechi S. & Upton, Joanna & Bageant, Elizabeth, "undated". "Food Insecurity and Family Structure in Nigeria," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258469, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Adjei-Mantey, Kwame & Takeuchi, Kenji & Quartey, Peter, 2021. "Impact of LPG promotion program in Ghana: The role of distance to refill," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    11. Gould, Carlos F. & Urpelainen, Johannes, 2018. "LPG as a clean cooking fuel: Adoption, use, and impact in rural India," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 395-408.
    12. Park, Jisung & Bangalore, Mook & Hallegatte, Stephane & Sandhoefner, Evan, 2018. "Households and heat stress: estimating the distributional consequences of climate change," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(3), pages 349-368, June.
    13. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    14. Raymond, Christopher M. & Kenter, Jasper O., 2016. "Transcendental values and the valuation and management of ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 21(PB), pages 241-257.
    15. Dede Woade Gafa & Louis Sitsofe Hodey & Bernardin Senadza, 2024. "Examining Poverty Dynamics in Ghana: Evidence from Longitudinal and Repeated Cross-Sectional Data," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 33(Supplemen), pages 136-157.
    16. D. Liliana González-Hernández & Erik W. Meijles & Frank Vanclay, 2019. "Household Barriers to Climate Change Action: Perspectives from Nuevo Leon, Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-14, August.
    17. Pelletier, Johanne & Hamalambo, Boniface & Trainor, Anne & Barrett, Christopher B., 2021. "How land tenure and labor relations mediate charcoal’s environmental footprint in Zambia: Implications for sustainable energy transitions," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    18. Frank Adusah-Poku & Samuel Adams & Kwame Adjei-Mantey, 2023. "Does the gender of the household head affect household energy choice in Ghana? An empirical analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 6049-6070, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martey, Edward & Etwire, Prince M. & Atinga, David & Yevu, Mawuli, 2021. "Household energy choice for cooking among the time and consumption poor in Ghana," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    2. Vyas, Sangita & Gupta, Aashish & Khalid, Nazar, 2021. "Gender and LPG use after government intervention in rural north India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    3. Li Huang & Heng Wu & Mi Zhou, 2022. "Implications of Non-Farm Work for Clean Energy Adoption: Evidence from Rural China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Vyas, Sangita & Gupta, Aashish & Khalid, Nazar, 2020. "Gender and LPG use after government intervention in rural north India," SocArXiv 3v4cj, Center for Open Science.
    5. repec:osf:socarx:3v4cj_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Troncoso, Karin & Segurado, Patricia & Aguilar, Margarita & Soares da Silva, Agnes, 2019. "Adoption of LPG for cooking in two rural communities of Chiapas, Mexico," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    7. Ana María González & Harrison Sandoval & Pilar Acosta & Felipe Henao, 2016. "On the Acceptance and Sustainability of Renewable Energy Projects—A Systems Thinking Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-21, November.
    8. Egbendewe, Aklesso Y. G. & Yevesse, Dandonougbo, 2022. "Cooking fuels’ choice, women’s health and CO2 emissions in selected rural West African countries," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322481, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Swain, Swadhina Shikha & Mishra, Pulak, 2021. "How does cleaner energy transition influence standard of living and natural resources conservation? A study of households’ perceptions in rural Odisha, India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PB).
    10. Lindgren, Samantha, 2021. "Cookstove implementation and Education for Sustainable Development: A review of the field and proposed research agenda," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    11. Chen, Jiahui & Liao, Hua & Zhang, Tong, 2024. "Empowering women substantially accelerates the household clean energy transition in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    12. Akter, Sonia & Mathew, Nikhitha Mary & Fila, Marian Edward, 2023. "The impact of an improvement in the quality and reliability of rural residential electricity supply on clean cooking fuel adoption: Evidence from six energy poor Indian states," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    13. Céline Guivarch & Nicolas Taconet, 2020. "Inégalités mondiales et changement climatique," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(1), pages 35-70.
    14. Gould, Carlos F. & Jha, Shaily & Patnaik, Sasmita & Agrawal, Shalu & Zhang, Alice Tianbo & Saluja, Sonakshi & Nandan, Vagisha & Mani, Sunil & Urpelainen, Johannes, 2022. "Variability in the household use of cooking fuels: The importance of dishes cooked, non-cooking end uses, and seasonality in understanding fuel stacking in rural and urban slum communities in six north Indian states," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    15. Zhu, Xiaodong & Zhu, Zheng & Zhu, Bangzhu & Wang, Ping, 2022. "The determinants of energy choice for household cooking in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    16. Tewodros Tarekegn Lapiso & Hynek Roubík, 2025. "A Systematic Scoping Review of Biogas as an Instrumental Technology for a Circular Economy and a Way Forward to Ensure Sustainable Development in the Context of Global South Nations," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(6), pages 9073-9105, December.
    17. Yao, Min & Liu, Lei, 2025. "Does population aging aggravate energy poverty: An examination of clean cooking fuel choice in rural China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 210-230.
    18. Alison Pye & Sara Ronzi & Bertrand Hugo Mbatchou Ngahane & Elisa Puzzolo & Atongno Humphrey Ashu & Daniel Pope, 2020. "Drivers of the Adoption and Exclusive Use of Clean Fuel for Cooking in Sub-Saharan Africa: Learnings and Policy Considerations from Cameroon," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-24, August.
    19. Ng'ombe, John N. & Sambo, Cleopas G. & Asiseh, Fafanyo & Prah, Stephen & Quaicoe, Obed & Takumah, Wisdom, 2026. "Firewood, charcoal or electricity? Gender gaps in cooking, heating, and lighting energy use in Zambia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    20. Awan, Ashar & Bilgili, Faik & Rahut, Dil Bahadur, 2022. "Energy poverty trends and determinants in Pakistan: Empirical evidence from eight waves of HIES 1998–2019," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    21. Paulina Schiappacasse & Bernhard Müller & Le Thuy Linh, 2019. "Towards Responsible Aggregate Mining in Vietnam," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:44:y:2026:i:2:n:e70060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.