IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v43y2025i6ne70042.html

Digital access and women's work in Pakistan: Constraints, use patterns, and policy directions

Author

Listed:
  • Hadia Majid
  • Maryam Mustafa
  • Maria Nazar

Abstract

Motivation Mobile and internet usage has seen accelerated upward trends following the COVID‐19 shock. There is growing evidence of the significant potential inherent in digital spaces in terms of upskilling, networking, and expanding earning opportunities. However, despite its potential, there remains a substantial divide in access to digital spaces, particularly from a gender perspective. This is especially so in patriarchal societies with strictly defined gender roles such as in Pakistan. Purpose In this article, we focus on women's patterns of digital technology and social media use in Pakistan and examine how these broadly connect with the labour market. We also explore the immense potential of the digital ecosystem, as well as the challenges women face in utilizing digital technologies to enhance their earning opportunities. Approach and methods Our study uses extensive qualitative research in the form of in‐depth interviews, field observations, and focus group discussions with approximately 250 women of varying socioeconomic status, professions, and educational backgrounds. We also engaged with women's rights organizations, capacity building experts, and digital trainers in Pakistan. Findings Our findings suggest that although the digital ecosystem in Pakistan has significant potential to improve women's economic opportunities and outcomes, there are also substantial barriers that prevent them from fully engaging in the digital environment. We identify these constraints as: financial and time constraints, limited trust and privacy concerns, gendered power dynamics, and inadequate structures and infrastructural support. Policy implications It is imperative to implement processes and laws that utilize digital technology as a tool for the financial and social empowerment of women in Pakistan. Our article recommends increased government involvement and collaboration with private entities to provide affordable access to mobile phones and digital accessories, fund training and awareness programmes that promote the sustainable use of digital technology, and raise awareness about data privacy and online security.

Suggested Citation

  • Hadia Majid & Maryam Mustafa & Maria Nazar, 2025. "Digital access and women's work in Pakistan: Constraints, use patterns, and policy directions," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 43(6), November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:43:y:2025:i:6:n:e70042
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.70042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.70042
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.70042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dosi, Giovanni & Grazzi, Marco & Moschella, Daniele, 2015. "Technology and costs in international competitiveness: From countries and sectors to firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(10), pages 1795-1814.
    2. Zi Hui Yin & Ting Hui Zhang & Chang Hwan Choi, 2023. "Toward sustainable development: Does digitalization narrow the gender gap in the labor market?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(5), pages 3528-3539, October.
    3. Jamil, Sadia, 2021. "From digital divide to digital inclusion: Challenges for wide-ranging digitalization in Pakistan," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(8).
    4. Brian P. Cozzarin, 2016. "Advanced technology, innovation, wages and productivity in the Canadian manufacturing sector," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(4), pages 243-249, March.
    5. Mark Doms & Eric J. Bartelsman, 2000. "Understanding Productivity: Lessons from Longitudinal Microdata," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 38(3), pages 569-594, September.
    6. Najam Us Saqib & G. M. Arif, 2012. "Time Poverty, Work Status and Gender: The Case of Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 51(1), pages 23-46.
    7. Galor, Oded & Weil, David N, 1996. "The Gender Gap, Fertility, and Growth," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 86(3), pages 374-387, June.
    8. Naila Kabeer, 1999. "Resources, Agency, Achievements: Reflections on the Measurement of Women's Empowerment," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 30(3), pages 435-464, July.
    9. Robert Mcguckin & Mary Streitwieser & Mark Doms, 1998. "The Effect Of Technology Use On Productivity Growth," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 1-26.
    10. Mariscal, Judith & Mayne, Gloria & Aneja, Urvashi & Sorgner, Alina, 2019. "Bridging the gender digital gap," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy, vol. 13, pages 1-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Finlay, Jocelyn E. & Gulaid, Mariam & Mibenge, Chiseche & Madise, Nyovani & Dodoo, Naa Dodua & Stover, John & Weinberger, Michelle & O’Brien, Michelle & Zimmermann, Marita, 2025. "Contraception to women’s economic empowerment: A narrative review," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    2. Sang Nguyen & B.K. Atrostic, 2005. "Computer Investment, Computer Networks and Productivity," Working Papers 05-01, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    3. Abdulrazaq Kamal Daudu & Sidiqat Adeyemi Aderinoye-Abdulwahab & Oyedola Waheed Kareem & Alhassan Abdul-Wakeel Karakara & Latifat Kehinde Olatinwo & Halimah Olayinka Egbewole, 2025. "Gendered access to e-logistics platforms in urban agriculture: micro-level evidence from Nigeria," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-26, December.
    4. Fontanelli, Luca & Guerini, Mattia & Napoletano, Mauro, 2023. "International trade and technological competition in markets with dynamic increasing returns," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    5. Chaudhuri, Sanjukta, 2010. "Women's Empowerment in South Asia and Southeast Asia: A Comparative Analysis," MPRA Paper 19686, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Rihab Khalid & Hadia Majid & Rabia Saeed & Alaiba Faheem & Charlotte Lemanski, 2025. "SPATIALIZING WOMEN'S EVERYDAY ACCESS TO ENERGY: An Intra‐urban Comparison of the Gender Energy Nexus in Lahore, Pakistan," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 660-681, May.
    7. B.K. Atrostic & Sang V. Nguyen, 2002. "Computer Networks and U.S. Manufacturing Plant Productivity: New Evidence from the CNUS Data," Working Papers 02-01, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    8. Emanuele Brancati & Raffaele Brancati & Dario Guarascio & Antonello Zanfei, 2022. "Innovation drivers of external competitiveness in the great recession," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 1497-1516, March.
    9. Brancati, Emanuele & Brancati, Raffaele & Guarascio, Dario & Zanfei, Antonello, 2020. "In Times of Trouble: Innovative Drivers of External Competitiveness for Small Businesses during the Great Recession," GLO Discussion Paper Series 639, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    10. Anne Leahy & Joanne Loundes & Elizabeth Webster & Jongsay Yong, 2004. "Industrial Capabilities in Victoria," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 15(1), pages 74-98, June.
    11. Wyndow, Paula & Li, Jianghong & Mattes, Eugen, 2013. "Female Empowerment as a Core Driver of Democratic Development: A Dynamic Panel Model from 1980 to 2005," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 34-54.
    12. Helen M. Haugh & Alka Talwar, 2016. "Linking Social Entrepreneurship and Social Change: The Mediating Role of Empowerment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(4), pages 643-658, February.
    13. Joachim Wagner, 2012. "Exports, R&D and productivity: a test of the Bustos-model with German enterprise data," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 32(3), pages 1942-1948.
    14. Kawalec Paweł, 2020. "The dynamics of theories of economic growth: An impact of Unified Growth Theory," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 6(2), pages 19-44, June.
    15. Long, Teng & Bu, Kun & Du, Pengfei & Wang, Zhige, 2024. "Can educational investment mitigate the impact of aging on household leverage ratio?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(PA), pages 1335-1347.
    16. Matthias Doepke, "undated". "Growth Takeoffs," UCLA Economics Online Papers 409, UCLA Department of Economics.
    17. Rao, Nitya, 2017. "Assets, Agency and Legitimacy: Towards a Relational Understanding of Gender Equality Policy and Practice," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 43-54.
    18. Kathryn M Yount & Agnes Quisumbing & Ruth Meinzen-Dick & Hazel Malapit & Md Zahidul Hassan & Shelton S E Kanyanda & Sudhindra Sharma & Md Imrul Hassan & Jessica Heckert & Flor Paz & Pankaj Pokhrel & W, 2026. "Women’s Empowerment Metric for National Statistical Systems (WEMNS): Development and psychometric assessment of a face-to-face survey module," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 21(5), pages 1-27, May.
    19. Keller, Elisa, 2019. "Labor supply and gender differences in occupational choice," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 221-241.
    20. DeJaeghere, Joan & Pellowski Wiger, Nancy & Le, Hue & Luong, Phuong & Ngo, Nga Thi Hang & Vu, Thanh Thi & Lee, Jongwook, 2022. "Why do aspirations matter for empowerment?: Discrepancies between the A-WEAI domains and aspirations of ethnic minority women in Vietnam," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:43:y:2025:i:6:n:e70042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.