IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v43y2025i5ne70025.html

A critical approach to co‐producing knowledge for development

Author

Listed:
  • Ryan Nehring
  • Fernando Galeana
  • Hilary Faxon

Abstract

Motivation The concept of co‐production has gained currency in development policy as an approach for collaboration and/or stakeholder participation to improve development outcomes. Co‐production implies bringing together different knowledges to create something new, acknowledging that knowledge is both plural and partial; there are multiple ways of knowing and no one way represents truth. Yet existing literature on co‐production tends to focus mostly on strategies for engagement rather than reckoning with structural forces and practical problems to realizing co‐production. Purpose This article asks how the implementation of the co‐production concept can account for relations of power. It develops a conceptual framework and practical guidance for co‐producing knowledge for development. Approach and Methods The study provides an overview of the theory and practice of co‐production and assesses its use in existing development policy. It draws on insights from political ecology literature to construct a conceptual framework and set of practical strategies for implementing co‐production. Findings This article advances an approach to the co‐production of knowledge that integrates political economy, reflexivity, and participatory methodologies to guide collaboration. This approach accounts for historical marginalization and unequal power relations to guide development interventions and/or policy. Policy Implications The article warns against uncritical adoption of co‐production and highlights practical measures to examine power relations in order to understand challenges and enact equitable sustainable development in diverse settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryan Nehring & Fernando Galeana & Hilary Faxon, 2025. "A critical approach to co‐producing knowledge for development," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 43(5), September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:43:y:2025:i:5:n:e70025
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.70025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.70025
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.70025?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van der Hel, Sandra, 2016. "New science for global sustainability? The institutionalisation of knowledge co-production in Future Earth," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 165-175.
    2. Stina Hansson & Merritt Polk, 2018. "Assessing the impact of transdisciplinary research: The usefulness of relevance, credibility, and legitimacy for understanding the link between process and impact," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 27(2), pages 132-144.
    3. Artila Devi, 2023. "How co‐design can localize development programmes and reduce dependency: Examples from Pacific Island Countries," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(S2), December.
    4. Merilee S. Grindle, 1999. "In Quest of the Political: The Political Economy of Development Policy Making," CID Working Papers 17A, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    5. Walter Leal Filho & Franziska Wolf & Edmond Totin & Luckson Zvobgo & Nicholas Philip Simpson & Kumbirai Musiyiwa & Jokastah W. Kalangu & Maruf Sanni & Ibidun Adelekan & Jackson Efitre & Felix Kwabena , 2023. "Is indigenous knowledge serving climate adaptation? Evidence from various African regions," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(2), March.
    6. Lund, Jens Friis & Saito-Jensen, Moeko, 2013. "Revisiting the Issue of Elite Capture of Participatory Initiatives," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 104-112.
    7. Millner, Naomi & Peñagaricano, Irune & Fernandez, Maria & Snook, Laura K., 2020. "The politics of participation: Negotiating relationships through community forestry in the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    8. Janina Grabs & Stefano Ponte, 2019. "The evolution of power in the global coffee value chain and production network," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(4), pages 803-828.
    9. Ostrom, Elinor, 1996. "Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 1073-1087, June.
    10. Kattie Lussier & Mohammed Fakher, 2018. "Harnessing civil society's knowledge for development policy: Potential and challenges for the Republic of Yemen," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(S2), pages 914-934, September.
    11. Merilee S. Grindle, 1999. "In Quest of the Political: The Political Economy of Development Policy Making," CID Working Papers 17, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    12. Joanne Vinke‐de Kruijf & Laura Verbrugge & Barbara Schröter & Robert‐Jan den Haan & Juliette Cortes Arevalo & Jan Fliervoet & Jennifer Henze & Christian Albert, 2022. "Knowledge co‐production and researcher roles in transdisciplinary environmental management projects," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(2), pages 393-405, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Resnick, Danielle & Babu, Suresh & Haggblade, Steven & Hendriks, Sheryl L. & Mather, David, "undated". "Conceptualizing Drivers Of Policy Change In Agriculture, Nutrition, And Food Security: The Kaleidoscope Model," Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy Research Papers 258732, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security (FSP).
    2. Sam Hickey, 2009. "The return of politics in development studies (II)," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 9(2), pages 141-152, April.
    3. Gert Jan A. Veldwisch & Peter P. Mollinga, 2013. "Lost in transition? The introduction of water users associations in Uzbekistan," Water International, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(6), pages 758-773, October.
    4. Tim Campbell & Harald Fuhr, 2004. "Leadership and Innovation in Subnational Government : Case Studies from Latin America," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 15023, April.
    5. Livia Fritz & Claudia R. Binder, 2018. "Participation as Relational Space: A Critical Approach to Analysing Participation in Sustainability Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-29, August.
    6. Kalmah Kalmah & Endang Larasati & Hartuti Purnaweni & Kismartini Kismartini, 2022. "Policy Content Analysis of Rawapening Lake Management Team," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 38(1), pages 768-778, December.
    7. Engel, Nora, 2008. "Drivers and Barriers of Innovation Dynamics in Healthcare - Towards a framework for analyzing innovation in Tuberculosis control in India," MERIT Working Papers 2008-077, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    8. Jacob Torfing & Eva Sørensen, 2019. "Interactive Political Leadership in Theory and Practice: How Elected Politicians May Benefit from Co-Creating Public Value Outcomes," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Genowefa Blundo-Canto & Bernard Triomphe & Guy Faure & Danielle Barret & Aurelle de Romemont & Etienne Hainzelin, 2019. "Building a culture of impact in an international agricultural research organization: Process and reflective learning," Research Evaluation, Oxford University Press, vol. 28(2), pages 136-144.
    10. Jane Freedman & Tamaryn L. Crankshaw & Yasmin Rajah & Victoria Marcia Mutambara, 2024. "“But We Just Need Money”: (Im)Possibilities of Co‐Producing Knowledge With Those in Vulnerable Situations," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    11. Andersson, Krister P. & Smith, Steven M. & Alston, Lee J. & Duchelle, Amy E. & Mwangi, Esther & Larson, Anne M. & de Sassi, Claudio & Sills, Erin O. & Sunderlin, William D. & Wong, Grace Y., 2018. "Wealth and the distribution of benefits from tropical forests: Implications for REDD+," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 510-522.
    12. Hallberg-Sramek, Isabella & Nordström, Eva-Maria & Priebe, Janina & Reimerson, Elsa & Mårald, Erland & Nordin, Annika, 2023. "Combining scientific and local knowledge improves evaluating future scenarios of forest ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    13. Margareet Visser & Matthew Alford, 2024. "Governance and Power Across Intersecting Value Chains: The Case of South African Apples," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(1), pages 69-86, January.
    14. Upham, Dr Paul & Sovacool, Prof Benjamin & Ghosh, Dr Bipashyee, 2022. "Just transitions for industrial decarbonisation: A framework for innovation, participation, and justice," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    15. Anthony Bennett, 1998. "Sustainable public/private partnerships for public service delivery," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 22(3), pages 193-199, August.
    16. Valentina Burksiene & Jaroslav Dvorak & Mantas Duda, 2019. "Upstream Social Marketing for Implementing Mobile Government," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-13, July.
    17. Brian Dill, 2010. "Public-public partnerships in Urban water provision: The case of Dar es Salaam," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(5), pages 611-624.
    18. Antonio J. Castro & Cristina Quintas-Soriano & Jodi Brandt & Carla L. Atkinson & Colden V. Baxter & Morey Burnham & Benis N. Egoh & Marina García-Llorente & Jason P. Julian & Berta Martín-López & Feli, 2018. "Applying Place-Based Social-Ecological Research to Address Water Scarcity: Insights for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-13, May.
    19. Eggers, Jorg & Laschewski, Lutz & Schleyer, Christian, 2005. "Agri-Environmental Policy: Understanding the Role of Regional Administration," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24496, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. A. Arrighetti & G. Seravalli & G. Wolleb, 2001. "Social Capital, Institutions and Collective Action Between Firms," Economics Department Working Papers 2001-EP08, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:43:y:2025:i:5:n:e70025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.