IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v43y2025i4ne70020.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The limits to cash‐plus provision in protracted crises

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel Sabates‐Wheeler
  • Jeremy Lind
  • Carolina Holland‐Szyp

Abstract

Motivation Cash‐plus programmes have succeeded in places where different provisions (e.g., health, education, nutrition) are able to complement each other while augmenting a regular cash transfer payment. The institutional capacity to deliver an integrated support package has marked the effective functioning of these programmes. However, in contexts of conflict and protracted crisis and the associated disruptions of infrastructure damage, insecurity, distrust, and violence, the necessary institutional scaffolding for a well‐functioning cash‐plus programme becomes unstable and may collapse altogether. Despite this, cash‐plus programmes continue to be implemented in these contexts. Purpose We assess whether cash‐plus programmes are designed and delivered to reduce vulnerability and promote livelihoods in protracted crises, and if their outcomes resonate with their objectives. Approach and Methods We develop a multidimensional indicator of protracted crisis, incorporating conflict, displacement, and climate change vulnerability, and map this against the strength of national social protection systems. We review 97 cash‐plus programmes in 16 countries, examining design features, objectives, and outcomes. Findings The review exposes the weakness in relying on the usual small‐lift aims of cash‐plus interventions (such as the provision of seeds or poultry, or basic training in business) in contexts where household‐level barriers to improving livelihoods are dwarfed by macro‐level structural, political, and social ruptures. The evidence demonstrates that most cash‐plus interventions are not designed or delivered in ways suitable for crises. Policy Implications Household‐level objectives will be stymied by institutional and political disruptions; therefore, programmes must also seek to help reshape the context in which people live. During active conflict (as compared to intermittent violence), cash‐plus may simply be impossible: it may be better to focus on providing for basic needs, such as through humanitarian aid.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel Sabates‐Wheeler & Jeremy Lind & Carolina Holland‐Szyp, 2025. "The limits to cash‐plus provision in protracted crises," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 43(4), July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:43:y:2025:i:4:n:e70020
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.70020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.70020
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.70020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:43:y:2025:i:4:n:e70020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.