IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v43y2025i4ne70015.html

Public Policy for Trans People: Lessons from Brazil for Social Inclusion

Author

Listed:
  • João Vitor Rodrigues Gonçalves
  • Liziane Angelotti Meira

Abstract

Motivation In Brazil, as elsewhere, trans people are often subjected to a historical process of social exclusion. This phenomenon not only perpetuates discriminatory attitudes but also actively prevents the participation of this community in society. Consequently, social marginalisation becomes not only a method of survival, but also an involuntary decision for a large part of this minority. Objective Brazil's Transcidadania Programme, created in 2015, can be interpreted as a solution to reverse this scenario. This study aims to identify, describe and analyse the model of social reintegration used in the programme. Approach and methods We used a single case study as the main methodological resource of this qualitative research due to the uniqueness of the programme, combined with semi‐structured interviews with key actors in the programme. Conclusions The social reintegration model of the Transcidadania programme is structured around three pillars: (1) reception; (2) incentive; and (3) monitoring. Our results indicate that the model, as well as being considered institutionally viable, presents a simplified structure that can be replicated. This study can contribute to the discussions on the analysis of affirmative policies targeting sexual minorities, a focus considered scarce within affirmative policy studies. In practical terms, our findings will be of value to policymakers looking to establish and develop public policies for trans people and other sexual minorities. Political implications Access to citizenship for trans people is a challenge worldwide. There are few policies and programmes aimed at changing this situation. For this reason, we believe that the model adopted by Transcidadania could be considered an initiative capable of being disseminated to nations that, like Brazil, face serious human rights violations and controversial political contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • João Vitor Rodrigues Gonçalves & Liziane Angelotti Meira, 2025. "Public Policy for Trans People: Lessons from Brazil for Social Inclusion," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 43(4), July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:43:y:2025:i:4:n:e70015
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.70015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.70015
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.70015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chimaraoke Izugbara & Meroji Sebany & Frederick Wekesah & Boniface Ushie, 2022. "“The SDGs are not God”: Policy‐makers and the queering of the Sustainable Development Goals in Africa," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(2), March.
    2. Rikhil R. Bhavnani & Alexander Lee, 2021. "Does Affirmative Action Worsen Bureaucratic Performance? Evidence from the Indian Administrative Service," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(1), pages 5-20, January.
    3. Erin A. Cech & Michelle V. Pham, 2017. "Queer in STEM Organizations: Workplace Disadvantages for LGBT Employees in STEM Related Federal Agencies," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Conrad Miller, 2017. "The Persistent Effect of Temporary Affirmative Action," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 9(3), pages 152-190, July.
    5. Harry J. Holzer & David Neumark, 2006. "Affirmative action: What do we know?," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(2), pages 463-490.
    6. Priscila S. dos Santos & Kalinca L. Becker & Sibele V. de Oliveira, 2023. "Race‐based affirmative action for higher education in Brazil: Impact assessment on performance, time, and delay in completion," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 247-267, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amano-Patiño, N. & Aramburu, J. & Contractor, Z., 2026. "Is Affirmative Action in Employment Still Effective in the 21st Century?," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2262, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    2. Noriko Amano-Patiño & Julian Aramburu & Zara Contractor, 2022. "Is Affirmative Action in Employment Still Effective in the 21st Century?," Working Papers 22-54, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    3. Osório, António (António Miguel), 2021. "The society gendered equilibrium: in search for an economic rationale," Working Papers 2072/534913, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    4. Charlie Blunden, 2022. "Between Market Failures and Justice Failures: Trade-Offs Between Efficiency and Equality in Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 647-660, July.
    5. Aouad, Marion, 2021. "An Examination of the Intracorrelation of Family Health Insurance," IZA Discussion Papers 14541, IZA Network @ LISER.
    6. Edward H. Chang & Erika L. Kirgios, 2024. "Demographic “Stickiness”: The Demographic Identity of Departing Group Members Influences Who Is Chosen to Replace Them," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(7), pages 4236-4259, July.
    7. Lukas Bolte & Nicole Immorlica & Matthew O. Jackson, 2026. "The Role of Referrals in Immobility, Inequality, and Inefficiency in Labor Markets," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 44(2), pages 447-479.
    8. Nguyen, The Linh Bao, 2025. "Affirmative action, Education and Labor market outcomes in Vietnam," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    9. Duryea, Suzanne & Millán-Quijano, Jaime & Morrison, Judith & Oviedo, Yanira, 2025. "Measuring racial bias in employment services in Colombia," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    10. Sarah Thébaud & Maria Charles, 2018. "Segregation, Stereotypes, and STEM," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Haus, Martin, 2026. "Breaking out of low-effort traps: bureaucratic leadership by persuasion," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 138865, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Erin A. Cech & William R. Rothwell, 2020. "LGBT Workplace Inequality in the Federal Workforce: Intersectional Processes, Organizational Contexts, and Turnover Considerations," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 73(1), pages 25-60, January.
    13. Sievert, Martin & Vogel, Dominik & Döring, Matthias, 2024. "Gendered Language in Job Advertisements Relates to Gender Sorting in Public Labor Markets: A Multi-Source Analysis," SocArXiv u6z5e, Center for Open Science.
    14. Fanfani, Bernardo, 2022. "Tastes for discrimination in monopsonistic labour markets," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    15. Amano-Patiño, N. & Aramburu, J. & Contractor, Z., 2021. "The Effect of Affirmative Action on Workers' Outcomes," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 2104, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    16. Elizabeth L. Doran & Ann P. Bartel & Jane Waldfogel, 2018. "Gender in the Labor Market: The Role of Equal Opportunity and Family-Friendly Policies," NBER Working Papers 25378, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Virginia Minni & Kieu-Trang Nguyen & Heather Sarsons & Carla Srebot, 2026. "Managers and the Cultural Transmission of Gender Norms," NBER Working Papers 34782, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Mimosa Distefano & Lorenzo Incoronato & Anna Raute, 2026. "Female-Targeted Hiring Subsidies, Firm Learning, and Women’s Employment," RFBerlin Discussion Paper Series 26211, ROCKWOOL Foundation Berlin (RFBerlin).
    19. Mallory Avery & Andreas Leibbrandt & Joseph Vecci, 2023. "Does Artificial Intelligence Help or Hurt Gender Diversity? Evidence from Two Field Experiments on Recruitment in Tech," Monash Economics Working Papers 2023-09, Monash University, Department of Economics.
    20. Samuel Nocito & Marcello Sartarelli & Francesco Sobbrio, 2021. "A Beam of Light: Media, Tourism & Economic Development," CESifo Working Paper Series 9055, CESifo.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:43:y:2025:i:4:n:e70015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.