IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v43y2025i4ne70011.html

Competition or collaboration? EU and Chinese engagement with aquaculture sustainability in Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Fatime L. Traore
  • Lin Zhang
  • Yuan Yuan
  • Annah Lake Zhu
  • Simon R. Bush

Abstract

Motivation The sustainability of aquaculture worldwide is increasingly shaped by international relations. The European Union (EU) and China have considerable influence on the sustainability of the industry, both domestically and globally. However, little is known about the similarities and differences between the region and country that govern aquaculture sustainability internally and how they shape the sustainability of the sector in other parts of the world, including rapidly developing aquaculture regions in Africa. Purpose We assess the domestic governance of sustainability in aquaculture in the EU and China. We then analyse the extent to which these two areas translate their internal sustainability goals into aquaculture‐related development cooperation with African countries. Approach and methods We undertook a scoping review of domestic policy for the sustainable development of aquaculture in the EU and China. We reviewed EU and Chinese development projects, financing, and trade policies supporting aquaculture development in Africa. The findings of these reviews were validated in a workshop. Findings Although the EU and China express similar technical and environmental concerns, they differ in their governance of their domestic aquaculture sectors. Similarly, at the international level, while both the EU and China have explicitly committed to promote sustainable aquaculture overseas, their approaches to achieving these ambitions through development cooperation differ substantially. EU cooperation includes creating (ambitious) norms for sustainability in Africa. China avoids influencing the domestic policies of African countries, preferring to provide training and technical cooperation. Our comparison reveals areas of existing competition between the EU and China in the development of aquaculture internationally, but also overlooked areas of potential complementarity and cooperation. Policy implications Our findings contribute to an improved understanding of aquaculture governance and enable the exploration of possibilities for greater alignment between EU and Chinese interventions in aquaculture around the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Fatime L. Traore & Lin Zhang & Yuan Yuan & Annah Lake Zhu & Simon R. Bush, 2025. "Competition or collaboration? EU and Chinese engagement with aquaculture sustainability in Africa," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 43(4), July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:43:y:2025:i:4:n:e70011
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.70011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.70011
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.70011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Frank Asche & Håkan Eggert & Atle Oglend & Cathy A. Roheim & Martin D. Smith, 2022. "Aquaculture: Externalities and Policy Options," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 16(2), pages 282-305.
    2. Fatima Olanike Kareem & Inmaculada Martínez-Zarzoso & Bernhard Brümmer, 2023. "What Drives Africa’s Inability to Comply with EU Standards? Insights from Africa’s Institution and Trade Facilitation Measures," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 35(4), pages 938-973, August.
    3. Bixuan Yang & James L. Anderson & Frank Asche, 2020. "Determinants of China’s Seafood Trade Patterns," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 35(2), pages 97-112.
    4. Taryn M. Garlock & Frank Asche & James L. Anderson & Håkan Eggert & Thomas M. Anderson & Bin Che & Carlos A. Chávez & Jingjie Chu & Nnaemeka Chukwuone & Madan M. Dey & Kevin Fitzsimmons & Jimely Flore, 2024. "Author Correction: Environmental, economic, and social sustainability in aquaculture: the aquaculture performance indicators," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-1, December.
    5. Ficawoyi Donou-Adonsou & Sokchea Lim, 2018. "On the importance of Chinese investment in Africa," Review of Development Finance Journal, Chartered Institute of Development Finance, vol. 8(1), pages 63-73.
    6. Naylor, Rosamond & Fang, Safari & Fanzo, Jessica, 2023. "A global view of aquaculture policy," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    7. Wil Hout, 2010. "Governance and Development: changing EU policies," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 1-12.
    8. Miller, Alice M.M. & Bush, Simon R. & Mol, Arthur P.J., 2014. "Power Europe: EU and the illegal, unreported and unregulated tuna fisheries regulation in the West and Central Pacific Ocean," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 138-145.
    9. Broughton, Edward I. & Walker, Damian G., 2010. "Policies and practices for aquaculture food safety in China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 471-478, October.
    10. Luo, Yadong & Xue, Qiuzhi & Han, Binjie, 2010. "How emerging market governments promote outward FDI: Experience from China," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 68-79, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oglend, Atle & Asche, Frank & Straume, Hans-Martin, 2024. "Rent formation and distortions due to quotas in biological production processes," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    2. Naylor, Rosamond & Fang, Safari & Fanzo, Jessica, 2023. "A global view of aquaculture policy," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    3. Taryn M. Garlock & Frank Asche & James L. Anderson & Håkan Eggert & Thomas M. Anderson & Bin Che & Carlos A. Chávez & Jingjie Chu & Nnaemeka Chukwuone & Madan M. Dey & Kevin Fitzsimmons & Jimely Flore, 2024. "Author Correction: Environmental, economic, and social sustainability in aquaculture: the aquaculture performance indicators," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-1, December.
    4. Hu, Dengfeng & You, Kefei & Esiyok, Bulent, 2021. "Foreign direct investment among developing markets and its technological impact on host: Evidence from spatial analysis of Chinese investment in Africa," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    5. Yaqin Liu & Martin D. Smith & Joshua K. Abbott & David Dietz & Dustin Colson Leaning & Adam Smyth & Tsugumi Yamashita, 2025. "The global seafood trade, embodied nutrients, and nutritional affordability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Lien, Yung-Chih & Filatotchev, Igor, 2015. "Ownership characteristics as determinants of FDI location decisions in emerging economies," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 50(4), pages 637-650.
    7. Alessia Amighini & Claudio Cozza & Roberta Rabellotti & Marco Sanfilippo, 2014. "Investigating Chinese Outward Foreign Direct Investments: How Can Firm-level Data Help?," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 22(6), pages 44-63, November.
    8. Xiaoyu Zhou & Yi Han & Rui Wang, 2013. "An Empirical Investigation on Firms’ Proactive and Passive Motivation for Bribery in China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(3), pages 461-472, December.
    9. Yekun Xu & Guangyuan Ma & Lijuan Cui, 2023. "Officials' Foreign Experience and Firms' Exports: Evidence from China," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 31(3), pages 173-204, May.
    10. Stefano Clo & Enrico Marvasi & Giorgio Ricchiuti, 2021. "The Internationalization of State-Owned Enterprises: An Analysis of cross-border M&As," Working Papers - Economics wp2021_06.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    11. Li, Linjie & Liu, Xiaming & Yuan, Dong & Yu, Miaojie, 2017. "Does outward FDI generate higher productivity for emerging economy MNEs? – Micro-level evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 839-854.
    12. Hu, Helen Wei & Cui, Lin, 2014. "Outward foreign direct investment of publicly listed firms from China: A corporate governance perspective," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 750-760.
    13. Muntasir Murshed & Seemran Rashid, 2020. "An Empirical Investigation of Real Exchange Rate Responses to Foreign Currency Inflows: Revisiting the Dutch Disease Phenomenon in South Asia," The Economics and Finance Letters, Conscientia Beam, vol. 7(1), pages 23-46.
    14. Dagnu Haile Tessema, 2025. "The impact of green human resource management practices on corporate sustainability: the case of public hospitals," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    15. Yang, Wei & Meyer, Klaus E., 2020. "How do local and foreign firms compete? Competitive actions in an emerging economy," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(3).
    16. Lu, Baizhou & Hao, Wei & Liao, Jing & Wongchoti, Udomsak, 2023. "A leap of faith that echoes well? The value impact of Chinese firms starting up business overseas," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    17. Ehouma Jacques Allou & Bosede Ngozi Adeleye & Jianhua Cheng & Rehman Abdul, 2020. "Is there a nexus between China outward foreign direct investment and welfare in Côte dʼIvoire? Empirical evidence from the Toda–Yamamoto procedure," African Development Review, African Development Bank, vol. 32(3), pages 499-510, September.
    18. Ozturk-Kose, Ebru & Tsagdis, Dimitrios & Jiménez, Alfredo, 2025. "Internationalization and escapism: Government support as a pullback force for small and large enterprises," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(3).
    19. Yuefang Si & Ingo Liefner, 2014. "Cognitive Distance and Obstacles to Subsidiary Business Success-The Experience of Chinese Companies in Germany," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(3), pages 285-300, July.
    20. Yuli Liu & Min Xu & Yu Huang & Ningning Fu, 2025. "Has the “Belt and Road Initiative” Promoted Chinese OFDI in Green Energy? Evidence from Chinese Energy Engagement in BRI Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-24, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:43:y:2025:i:4:n:e70011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.