IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v38y2020i2p226-241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of unequal regional distribution of fiscal resources on China’s post‐reform economic growth

Author

Listed:
  • Jr‐Tsung Huang
  • Ming‐Lei Chang

Abstract

Motivation The relationship between unequal fiscal resources among regions and China’s economic growth remains unclear due to its possibly different short‐ and long‐run directions. This study considers the role of unequal fiscal resources among regions in China’s economic growth. Purpose The article develops an empirical model to investigate the effect of unequal regional distribution of fiscal resources on China’s economic growth in the short and long run in the post‐reform period. Approach and Methods A time‐series data during the 1979–2010 period is used, adopting the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach plus co‐integration with two indicators of inequality, the GINI coefficient (GINI) and coefficient of variance (CV), calculated from different components of provincial fiscal revenue. Six model specifications of the ARDL plus co‐integration equation are estimated. Findings The primary finding is that, in the short run, China’s regional fiscal distribution inequality has a negative one‐year lagged effect on its economic growth as the fiscal subsidy from central government is considered. However, the long‐run equilibrium relationship between fiscal inequality and economic growth in China is positive during the research period. Policy Implications As China is pursuing sustainable economic growth and trying ultimately to achieve equal regional development, this study thus suggests that China should continue to support the principle of ‘let some people grow rich first’, perhaps implying that some regions should have more fiscal resources to develop successfully first. This will eventually benefit the country’s overall economic development.

Suggested Citation

  • Jr‐Tsung Huang & Ming‐Lei Chang, 2020. "The impact of unequal regional distribution of fiscal resources on China’s post‐reform economic growth," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(2), pages 226-241, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:38:y:2020:i:2:p:226-241
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12420
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12420
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.12420?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:38:y:2020:i:2:p:226-241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.