IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devpol/v37y2019i5p657-671.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accountability as strategic transparency: Making sense of organizational responses to the International Aid Transparency Initiative

Author

Listed:
  • James Pamment

Abstract

Aid transparency received a welcome boost in December 2011 when a critical mass of donors signed up to the International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI), an electronic registry through which all aid expenditure is published using the same criteria. IATI launched with statements about increased effectiveness, improved collaboration and better decisions based on greater transparency. This article investigates the strategic nature of organizational responses to IATI. It places particular emphasis on subtle distinctions between norms and standards, diminishing returns on the production of additional data, and inconsistently communicated benefits. It concludes that these factors contribute to IATI membership being rearticulated as part of the management of organizations' visibility, hence reformulating compliance with IATI as a form of strategic communication.

Suggested Citation

  • James Pamment, 2019. "Accountability as strategic transparency: Making sense of organizational responses to the International Aid Transparency Initiative," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 37(5), pages 657-671, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:37:y:2019:i:5:p:657-671
    DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12375
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12375
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dpr.12375?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devpol:v:37:y:2019:i:5:p:657-671. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/odioruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.