IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devchg/v56y2025i6p1258-1286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Minerals–Energy Complex in South Africa: An Empirical Debunking

Author

Listed:
  • Niall Reddy

Abstract

A hugely influential framework in South African political economy holds that the country has been dominated for the better part of a century by a Minerals–Energy Complex (MEC) comprising powerful firms and state agencies involved in mining and a range of downstream industries. The MEC is said to act as a ‘system of accumulation’ determining patterns of accumulation across the economy. This article argues that MEC theories rest on hollow empirical foundations. It shows, firstly, that the apparent size, stability and integration of MEC sectors in national accounting data are a statistical artefact of the overly expansive and ad hoc way in which the MEC has been defined. Secondly, it shows that the political‐institutional conditions for an MEC system of accumulation no longer exist, if they ever did. Conglomerates related to MEC sectors once possessed the ability to shape economy‐wide accumulation dynamics, but it is unclear if their interests were ever geared towards the self‐reproduction of core sectors at the expense of diversification. With liberalization those capacities were dismantled. The article closes by showing how assumptions of corporate hegemony — latently embedded in MEC theories — leave us unable to explain major trends in South African political economy such as state capture.

Suggested Citation

  • Niall Reddy, 2025. "The Minerals–Energy Complex in South Africa: An Empirical Debunking," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 56(6), pages 1258-1286, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:56:y:2025:i:6:p:1258-1286
    DOI: 10.1111/dech.70031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.70031
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dech.70031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:56:y:2025:i:6:p:1258-1286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0012-155X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.