IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devchg/v56y2025i1p172-224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Multiplier Effects of Government Expenditures on Social Protection: A Multi‐country Study

Author

Listed:
  • Dante Cardoso
  • Laura Carvalho
  • Gilberto Tadeu Lima
  • Luiza Nassif‐Pires
  • Fernando Rugitsky
  • Marina Sanches

Abstract

This article uses a novel dataset comprising 42 countries for the years 1985–2020 to explore the relationship between public spending on social protection and GDP. The article contributes to the empirical literature on social protection spending by conducting a large multi‐country study using the structural vector autoregression approach. The results of the study highlight the positive effects of social protection expenditures on GDP that surpass those of total government expenditures. These results vary considerably across countries, with impact multipliers ranging from 5 in Mexico to ‐0.71 in Paraguay. The authors find that the cumulative multiplier exceeds 1 for most of the 42 sample countries, suggesting that the positive impact of social protection spending on GDP accumulates over time. The article finds statistically significant and strong correlations between the cumulative and impact multipliers and inequality measures such as the Gini coefficient and the income shares of the poorest and the richest. Indeed, the positive impact of public spending on social protection on GDP is especially pronounced in countries characterized by higher inequality. Taken together, the results have significant policy implications and suggest that the growth‐enhancing potential of social protection policies is complementary to the ability of such policies to reduce inequality.

Suggested Citation

  • Dante Cardoso & Laura Carvalho & Gilberto Tadeu Lima & Luiza Nassif‐Pires & Fernando Rugitsky & Marina Sanches, 2025. "The Multiplier Effects of Government Expenditures on Social Protection: A Multi‐country Study," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 56(1), pages 172-224, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:56:y:2025:i:1:p:172-224
    DOI: 10.1111/dech.12869
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12869
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/dech.12869?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:56:y:2025:i:1:p:172-224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0012-155X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.