IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devchg/v45y2014i3p458-478.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conflicting Logics of Exceptionality: New Beginnings and the Problem of Police Violence in Post-Apartheid South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Gerhard Anders
  • Olaf Zenker
  • Steffen Jensen

Abstract

type="main"> This article explores the uneasy co-existence between two different pressing needs in post-apartheid South Africa: the urgency to reform the South African Police and the urgency to address the crime wave. Both imply a logic of exceptionality in that both are perceived to require extraordinary measures in exceptional times. On an abstract and ideal level, each of these logics of exceptionality envisages a new beginning, namely a democratic, prosperous and safe South Africa. On the level of everyday practices, however, they oppose each other radically. Indeed, they seem to conflict to the extent that the fulfilment of one is premised on the disavowal of the other. Through an exploration of how transitional justice through institutional reform fared in relation to the imperative to deal with crime, the police emerge as a central player — as the problem in relation to the first logic of exceptionality and the solution in addressing the second. The notions of conflicting logics of exceptionality and diverging new beginnings offer a useful framework for analysing and understanding the complexities at play. Empirically, the article explores police reform from 1994 until the present through ethnographic material in rural and urban South Africa as well as a media archive of police violence.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerhard Anders & Olaf Zenker & Steffen Jensen, 2014. "Conflicting Logics of Exceptionality: New Beginnings and the Problem of Police Violence in Post-Apartheid South Africa," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 45(3), pages 458-478, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:45:y:2014:i:3:p:458-478
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/dech.12088
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:45:y:2014:i:3:p:458-478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0012-155X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.