IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/devchg/v24y1993i2p305-338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bureaucratic Domination of Hunter‐Gatherer Societies: A Study of the San in Botswana

Author

Listed:
  • Robert K. Hitchcock
  • John D. Holm

Abstract

Social science analysis of hunter‐gatherer societies has highlighted their economic and cultural subordination to neighbouring peoples. This article shows that, at least in the case of the San in Botswana, state bureaucratic domination is becoming the determining factor in social change. The authors provide evidence of bureaucratic domination with respect to settlement of the San, the establishment of headmanship, extension of social services and environmental legislation. In this new environment, hunter‐gatherer self‐determination requires the creation of effective political organizations to counter the bureaucratic state. Some San groups in Botswana are already reacting to the expanding presence of the state by dramatically increasing their involvement in various aspects of Botswana's electoral politics. While the outcome of the San political challenge to the state is still in doubt, the authors conclude that San settlement is a precondition for political change in spite of the serious cultural sacrifice involved.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert K. Hitchcock & John D. Holm, 1993. "Bureaucratic Domination of Hunter‐Gatherer Societies: A Study of the San in Botswana," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 24(2), pages 305-338, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:24:y:1993:i:2:p:305-338
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.1993.tb00487.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1993.tb00487.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1993.tb00487.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:devchg:v:24:y:1993:i:2:p:305-338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0012-155X .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.