IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/chinae/v34y2026i4p118-151.html

The Effect of Urban–Rural Pension Insurance Integration on Perceived Social Security Fairness

Author

Listed:
  • Jiachang Liu
  • Fangzhou Cao

Abstract

Fairness and sustainability are major concerns in social security reform. In 2014, to reduce urban–rural disparities in pension coverage and benefit levels, China merged the New Rural Social Pension Insurance and the Urban Resident Pension Insurance into the unified Urban and Rural Resident Pension Insurance. Using six waves of the Chinese Social Survey (2006–2019) and a staggered difference‐in‐differences design, this study examined the impact of the reform on perceived fairness of social security. It found an improvement in perceived fairness, particularly for rural residents and older adults. Mechanism analyses suggest that the reform improved perceived fairness through two channels: expanded coverage and improved access enhanced rural residents' perceptions of urban–rural fairness, while higher basic pension levels and stronger fund sustainability increased the benefits received by older adults and, thereby, strengthened their perceptions of fairness. Continued refinement of the pension system, especially through support for vulnerable groups, is essential to promote a more equitable and sustainable social security system.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiachang Liu & Fangzhou Cao, 2026. "The Effect of Urban–Rural Pension Insurance Integration on Perceived Social Security Fairness," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 34(4), pages 118-151, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:chinae:v:34:y:2026:i:4:p:118-151
    DOI: 10.1111/cwe.70037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.70037
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/cwe.70037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:chinae:v:34:y:2026:i:4:p:118-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwepacn.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.