IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/chinae/v33y2025i6p173-213.html

A Quantitative Analysis of the US–China Trade Tension

Author

Listed:
  • Jingxin Ning
  • Ruobing Qin
  • Hong Ma

Abstract

How would an escalation of trade tensions between the world's two largest economies reshape global trade patterns and welfare? This study quantified the global effects of potential tariff increases under the second Trump administration using a quantitative general equilibrium model that captured input–output trade linkages. A simulation of a 30 percent increase in US tariffs on Chinese imports indicated that China's exports to the US would fall by 59.1 percent for intermediate goods and 52.7 percent for final goods, with significant diversion toward Mexico and Canada. At the same time, US imports would shift toward Association of Southeast Asian Nations countries, South Korea, and a few other economies. Certain third countries would experience modest welfare improvements but broader tariff escalation scenarios would result in welfare losses for all economies. These findings underscore the critical importance of maintaining open trade polices and stable international trade relations for global economic welfare. Dialogue and cooperation between the US and China are essential to navigate trade complexities and foster a more resilient and prosperous global economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingxin Ning & Ruobing Qin & Hong Ma, 2025. "A Quantitative Analysis of the US–China Trade Tension," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 33(6), pages 173-213, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:chinae:v:33:y:2025:i:6:p:173-213
    DOI: 10.1111/cwe.12622
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12622
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/cwe.12622?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:chinae:v:33:y:2025:i:6:p:173-213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwepacn.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.