IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/chinae/v33y2025i4p155-178.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Decade of Evolving Sentiment on the Belt and Road Initiative in Elite Magazines

Author

Listed:
  • Tariq H. Malik
  • Miaojie Yu
  • Jack Hou

Abstract

This study employs a multidisciplinary theoretical framework – drawing on fields such as media framing, agenda setting, and the economic and political dimensions – to conduct a sentiment analysis of 507 articles on the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) published in The Economist, Financial Times, Foreign Affairs, and Economic and Political Weekly. Three key findings emerge. First, negative sentiment dominates the overall discourse. Second, a clear disparity exists between financial and political magazines: Financial publications present the BRI more positively, whereas political ones present the BRI more negatively. Third, a timeline analysis from 2013 to 2023 shows a gradual shift toward more negative coverage. It means that the age of the BRI project attracts increased resistance. These findings offer valuable insights into the evolving perceptions and attitudes surrounding the BRI in influential global media outlets, providing a nuanced understanding of how media framing and the interplay between economic and political dimensions can shape public discourse on complex geopolitical initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Tariq H. Malik & Miaojie Yu & Jack Hou, 2025. "A Decade of Evolving Sentiment on the Belt and Road Initiative in Elite Magazines," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 33(4), pages 155-178, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:chinae:v:33:y:2025:i:4:p:155-178
    DOI: 10.1111/cwe.12600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12600
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/cwe.12600?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:chinae:v:33:y:2025:i:4:p:155-178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwepacn.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.