IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/canjag/v55y2007i4p565-586.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the Structure of Canadian Farm Incomes in the Design of Safety Net Programs1

Author

Listed:
  • Al Mussell
  • Terri‐lyn Moore
  • Ken McEwan
  • Randy Duffy

Abstract

The effectiveness of safety net programs in meeting their purpose depends implicitly on the nature of farm profitability distributions. This study provides an empirical characterization of farm operating profit distributions and assesses the implications for Canadian safety net programs. Pooled time series data from the Statistics Canada Tax Data Program and the Farm Financial Survey is queried across a range of farm types and provinces, with quartile distributions of Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) within four farm‐size categories analyzed. The results show that regardless of farm type or province, there is greater variation in operating profit within a sales category than there is across the sales categories, and that the range in operating profit increases with size, revealing some very profitable small farms and unprofitable large farms. Thus, the discussion of the social value of farm stabilization programs ought not to be focused on farm size alone. L'efficacité avec laquelle les programmes de protection du revenu atteignent leurs objectifs dépend implicitement de la nature des distributions de probabilités des fermes. La présente étude établit une caractérisation empirique des distributions du bénéfice d'exploitation agricole et évalue les répercussions sur les programmes de protection du revenu au Canada. Des données chronologiques tirées du Programme des données fiscales (PDF) et de l'Enquête financière sur les fermes (EFF) de Statistique Canada sont totalisées par type de ferme et par province, y compris des distributions par quartile du résultat avant intérêts, impôts et dotations aux amortissements (EBITDA) de quatre catégories de taille de ferme. Les résultats ont montré que, sans égard au type de ferme ou à la province, la variation du bénéfice d'exploitation au sein d'une même catégorie de ventes était supérieure à la variation du bénéfice d'exploitation observée entre les différentes catégories de ventes et que l'étendue du bénéfice d'exploitation augmentait avec la taille, révélant des fermes de petite taille très rentables et des fermes de grande taille non rentables. Par conséquent, la discussion sur la valeur sociale des programmes de stabilisation du revenu agricole ne devrait pas s'appuyer sur la taille de la ferme uniquement.

Suggested Citation

  • Al Mussell & Terri‐lyn Moore & Ken McEwan & Randy Duffy, 2007. "Understanding the Structure of Canadian Farm Incomes in the Design of Safety Net Programs1," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 55(4), pages 565-586, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:canjag:v:55:y:2007:i:4:p:565-586
    DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7976.2007.00110.x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2007.00110.x
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2007.00110.x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:canjag:v:55:y:2007:i:4:p:565-586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/caefmea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.