IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/buecrs/v78y2026i3p559-572.html

Cross‐Ownership and Welfare‐Inferior Price Competition with Relative Profit Delegation Contracts

Author

Listed:
  • Mingqing Xing
  • Sang‐Ho Lee

Abstract

We consider management reward contracts based on relative profit performance under cross‐ownership and find nonequivalence of price and quantity competition. We also examine an endogenous choice of competition mode under unilateral cross‐ownership and show that the welfare‐inferior price competition can appear unless the product's substitutability is large enough, while this inferior result prevails under bilateral cross‐ownership. Our findings suggest that cross‐ownership between price‐competing firms is consistently anticompetitive under managerial delegation with relative profit delegation, highlighting that policy concern for competitive law should carefully monitor not only the intensity of market competition mode but also the product's substitutability.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingqing Xing & Sang‐Ho Lee, 2026. "Cross‐Ownership and Welfare‐Inferior Price Competition with Relative Profit Delegation Contracts," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 78(3), pages 559-572, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:buecrs:v:78:y:2026:i:3:p:559-572
    DOI: 10.1111/boer.70029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/boer.70029
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/boer.70029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:buecrs:v:78:y:2026:i:3:p:559-572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0307-3378 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.