IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/buecrs/v78y2026i1p141-151.html

Impacts of Administrative Penalties Toward Digital Technology Companies on Agency Costs: Insights From Chinese Listed Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Xiang Cheng
  • Yihua Ma

Abstract

Recently, Chinese administrative authorities have introduced administrative penalties, specifically targeting violations of adopting digital technology innovations and applications (termed administrative penalties toward digital technology companies, APDTs). These penalties have significantly heightened operational pressure on Chinese enterprises. This study explores the impact of APDTs on the agency costs between owners and managers. Through a combination of theoretical analysis and empirical testing utilizing Chinese city data and samples of listed companies from 2008 to 2020, we investigate the intricate mechanisms underlying this impact. The findings reveal that, first, APDTs exacerbate the agency conflict between owners and managers, resulting in increased agency costs. Second, the operational mechanism involves the elevation of firms’ debt capital and the reduction of their equity capital, consequently intensifying the agency costs between owners and managers. Lastly, the impact of APDTs on agency costs displays heterogeneity, diminishing as firms’ investment opportunities increase.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiang Cheng & Yihua Ma, 2026. "Impacts of Administrative Penalties Toward Digital Technology Companies on Agency Costs: Insights From Chinese Listed Companies," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 78(1), pages 141-151, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:buecrs:v:78:y:2026:i:1:p:141-151
    DOI: 10.1111/boer.70011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/boer.70011
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/boer.70011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:buecrs:v:78:y:2026:i:1:p:141-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0307-3378 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.