IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/buecrs/v53y2001i4p305-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Logical Framework for Coalitional Effectivity in Dynamic Procedures

Author

Listed:
  • Pauly, Marc

Abstract

Effectivity frames are introduced as a model of what groups of agents can achieve by coordinated action in dynamic processes such as extensive games with or without simultaneous moves. Local effectivity is distinguished from different kinds of global and terminal effectivity, respectively what groups of players can maintain throughout and what they can achieve eventually. Examples are provided of how effectivity frames can be used as a tool (1) to model complex multi-agent processes such as voting procedures, (2) to investigate the interplay between local and global properties of these dynamic procedures, and (3) to examine whether a particular effectivity function can be implemented or realized by a dynamic procedure of a specific type. Finally, a modal logic for local and global coalitional effectivity is presented, and it is shown how, for example, a realization question can be translated into this logical framework yielding a satisfiability problem. Copyright 2001 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd and the Board of Trustees of the Bulletin of Economic Research

Suggested Citation

  • Pauly, Marc, 2001. "A Logical Framework for Coalitional Effectivity in Dynamic Procedures," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(4), pages 305-324, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:buecrs:v:53:y:2001:i:4:p:305-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:buecrs:v:53:y:2001:i:4:p:305-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0307-3378 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.