IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v9y2000i6p378-389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leadership strategies for sustainable development: a case study of Suma Wholefoods

Author

Listed:
  • David Raymond Jones

Abstract

This paper explores possible leadership strategies for a firm wishing to move towards sustainable development, defined in its most holistic, long term, environmental, social and financial sense. Empirical, grounded theory, case study findings from Suma Wholefoods, a socially innovative U.K. worker co‐operative, are used to explore the above research aim. A case study of such a company could prove illuminating considering the importance placed by numerous authors on the links between worker participation, pluralism and sustainable development. The central objective of the paper is to consider to what extent Suma can maintain its pluralist commitment and practically move towards sustainable development, using a contextually appropriate leadership strategy. Realising that sustainable development may be more of a journey than a destination, Suma's past, present and possible future leadership strategies are explored. The case study findings argue against using solely participative or wider pluralist leadership strategies. Alternatively, the findings argue that a business should adopt a contextually appropriate set of leadership styles, based on different contingency theories. For Suma, a possible future leadership strategy would be predominantly pluralist, in order to take account of its enduring pluralist commitment. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. and ERP Environment

Suggested Citation

  • David Raymond Jones, 2000. "Leadership strategies for sustainable development: a case study of Suma Wholefoods," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(6), pages 378-389, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:9:y:2000:i:6:p:378-389
    DOI: 10.1002/1099-0836(200011/12)9:63.0.CO;2-F
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0836(200011/12)9:63.0.CO;2-F
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/1099-0836(200011/12)9:63.0.CO;2-F?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:9:y:2000:i:6:p:378-389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.