IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i6p7983-8016.html

Does Managerial Ability Improve Environmental Performance and Overall ESG Ratings? The Impact of the European Sustainability Reporting Mandate

Author

Listed:
  • Mihaela Ionașcu
  • Ion Ionașcu
  • Elena Turuianu

Abstract

This study examines the role of managerial ability in driving environmental performance and overall environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings in the context of the European Union sustainability reporting regulations. Using a sample of 7242 firm‐year observations over the period 2015–2023, our results indicate a structural change in the relationship between managerial ability and ESG scores, documenting an inverted U‐shaped relationship after the reporting mandate came into force. Our findings suggest that, in a more demanding organizational environment, more capable managers increase sustainability performance, but only up to a saturation point, around which they optimize the costs and benefits of ESG initiatives. Furthermore, we find that the relationship between managerial ability and sustainability performance is moderated by managerial discretion. The relationship weakens after the reporting mandate becomes effective, limiting managerial discretion, but strengthens in the presence of larger boards, which provide legitimacy to managerial decisions and more discretion regarding ESG.

Suggested Citation

  • Mihaela Ionașcu & Ion Ionașcu & Elena Turuianu, 2026. "Does Managerial Ability Improve Environmental Performance and Overall ESG Ratings? The Impact of the European Sustainability Reporting Mandate," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(6), pages 7983-8016, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:6:p:7983-8016
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70570
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70570?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:6:p:7983-8016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.