IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i5p7499-7519.html

Corporate Preferences for Biodiversity Investment: Evidence From a Discrete Choice Experiment Among Medium and Large European Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Qian Liu
  • Bo Jellesmark Thorsen
  • Kennet Christian Uggeldahl
  • Thomas Lundhede

Abstract

The deepening biodiversity crisis has turned attention to the role of private capital in conservation finance, as policymakers seek scalable solutions beyond public funding. Yet, empirical insights into corporate decision‐making on biodiversity investment remain limited, even though understanding such microlevel behavior helps inform the design of more effective biodiversity policies and investment mechanisms. We conduct a discrete choice experiment with 418 decision‐makers from medium and large firms across Europe, applying a mixed logit model to identify firms' preferences for project characteristics and cross‐firm variation in those preferences. Results reveal a clear preference for investment over inaction, particularly among firms in carbon‐intensive sectors, those led by environmentally informed executives, and those with favorable attitudes, reflecting perceived business relevance and expected benefits. Firms favor domestic projects, or projects located within Europe, and respond positively to both government and third‐party certification, though regional variation exists. Firms also prefer to align biodiversity investments with their sourcing geographies. While the findings should be treated with caution, as they are based on a limited subsample of corporate decision makers, they suggest that policy instruments aiming to scale up private biodiversity investments should prioritize credible certification schemes and support regionally anchored projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Qian Liu & Bo Jellesmark Thorsen & Kennet Christian Uggeldahl & Thomas Lundhede, 2026. "Corporate Preferences for Biodiversity Investment: Evidence From a Discrete Choice Experiment Among Medium and Large European Firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(5), pages 7499-7519, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:5:p:7499-7519
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70537
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70537?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dalia D'Amato & Alessandra La Notte & Mattia Damiani & Serenella Sala, 2024. "Biodiversity and ecosystem services in business sustainability: Toward systematic, value chain‐wide monitoring that aligns with public accounting," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(5), pages 1030-1044, October.
    2. Canessa, Carolin & Venus, Terese E. & Wiesmeier, Miriam & Mennig, Philipp & Sauer, Johannes, 2023. "Incentives, Rewards or Both in Payments for Ecosystem Services: Drawing a Link Between Farmers' Preferences and Biodiversity Levels," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    3. Chen, Cheng & Matzdorf, Bettina & Davis, Marlen, 2024. "Companies preferences and willingness to pay for ecosystem services credits through an online-marketplace," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    4. Katie Kedward & Josh Ryan-Collins & Hugues Chenet, 2023. "Biodiversity loss and climate change interactions: financial stability implications for central banks and financial supervisors," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(6), pages 763-781, July.
    5. Davies, Helen J. & Doick, Kieron J. & Hudson, Malcolm D. & Schaafsma, Marije & Schreckenberg, Kate & Valatin, Gregory, 2018. "Business attitudes towards funding ecosystem services provided by urban forests," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 32(PB), pages 159-169.
    6. Sven Wunder & Cecilia Fraccaroli & Joseph W. Bull & Trishna Dutta & Alison Eyres & Megan C. Evans & Bo Jellesmark Thorsen & Julia P. G. Jones & Martine Maron & Bart Muys & Andrea Pacheco & Asger Stran, 2025. "Biodiversity Credits: An Overview of the Current State, Future Opportunities, and Potential Pitfalls," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(7), pages 8470-8499, November.
    7. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555.
    8. W. Michael Hanemann, 1984. "Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 66(3), pages 332-341.
    9. Süring, Charlotte Marie & Lundhede, Thomas Hedemark, 2025. "Private forest owner preferences for action- and result-based biodiversity restoration contracts – A discrete choice experiment in Denmark and Finland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    10. Kelvin J. Lancaster, 1966. "A New Approach to Consumer Theory," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 74(2), pages 132-132.
    11. Boiral, Olivier & Heras-Saizarbitoria, Iñaki, 2017. "Best practices for corporate commitment to biodiversity: An organizing framework from GRI reports," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 77-85.
    12. Amit Kumar Gupta & Narain Gupta, 2021. "Environment Practices Mediating the Environmental Compliance and firm Performance: An Institutional Theory Perspective from Emerging Economies," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(3), pages 157-178, September.
    13. Hess, Stephane & Palma, David, 2019. "Apollo: A flexible, powerful and customisable freeware package for choice model estimation and application," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Marianne Bertrand & Sendhil Mullainathan, 2003. "Enjoying the Quiet Life? Corporate Governance and Managerial Preferences," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 111(5), pages 1043-1075, October.
    15. Krause, Marlen S. & Matzdorf, Bettina, 2019. "The intention of companies to invest in biodiversity and ecosystem services credits through an online-marketplace," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    16. Katie Kedward & Josh Ryan-Collins & Hugues Chenet, 2023. "Biodiversity loss and climate change interactions: financial stability implications for central banks and financial supervisors," Post-Print hal-04272244, HAL.
    17. G. Andrew Karolyi & John Tobin‐de la Puente, 2023. "Biodiversity finance: A call for research into financing nature," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 52(2), pages 231-251, June.
    18. Pedro F. Gattás & José Guilherme F. De Campos & Simone R. Barakat & Renato J. Orsato, 2019. "Ecosystem services valuation by pioneering companies," International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(3/4), pages 479-497.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lang, Ferdinand & Chen, Cheng & Alemu, Mohammed Hussen & Lundhede, Thomas & Olsen, Søren Bøye & Matzdorf, Bettina, 2026. "Private funding for soil health: Private individuals’ preferences for ecosystem services and biodiversity certificates," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    2. Christoph Schulze & Klaus Glenk & Julian Sagebiel & Bettina Matzdorf, 2026. "Private or Public? Farmer Preferences and Identities in Agri‐Environmental Contract Implementation," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(1), pages 107-129, February.
    3. Alcon, Francisco & Zabala, José A. & Martínez-Paz, José M., 2022. "Assessment of social demand heterogeneity to inform agricultural diffuse pollution mitigation policies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Marlen S. Krause & Nils Droste & Bettina Matzdorf, 2021. "What makes businesses commit to nature conservation?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 741-755, February.
    5. Domínguez-Torreiro, Marcos & Soliño, Mario, 2011. "Provided and perceived status quo in choice experiments: Implications for valuing the outputs of multifunctional rural areas," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(12), pages 2523-2531.
    6. Gómez-Limón, José A. & Granado-Díaz, Rubén, 2023. "Assessing the demand for hydrological drought insurance in irrigated agriculture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    7. Alemu I, Jahson Berhane & Schuhmann, Peter & Agard, John, 2019. "Mixed preferences for lionfish encounters on reefs in Tobago: Results from a choice experiment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Norton, Daniel & Hynes, Stephen, 2014. "Valuing the non-market benefits arising from the implementation of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 10(C), pages 84-96.
    9. Su, Jie & Gasparatos, Alexandros, 2024. "Assessing the heterogeneity of public acceptability for mangrove restoration through a choice experiment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    10. Rai, Rajesh Kumar & Scarborough, Helen, 2012. "Estimating the public benefits of mitigating damages caused by invasive plant species in a subsistence economy," 2012 Conference (56th), February 7-10, 2012, Fremantle, Australia 124421, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    11. Villanueva, Anastasio J. & Rodriguez-Entrena, Macario & Arriaza, Manuel & Gomez-Limon, Jose A., 2015. "Matching supply-side and demand-side analyses for the assessment of agri-environmental schemes: The case of irrigated olive groves of southern Spain," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 211919, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Tyllianakis, Emmanouil & Martin-Ortega, Julia & Ziv, Guy & Chapman, Pippa J. & Holden, Joseph & Cardwell, Michael & Fyfe, Duncan, 2023. "A window into land managers’ preferences for new forms of agri-environmental schemes: Evidence from a post-Brexit analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    13. George E. Halkos & Panagiotis‐Stavros C. Aslanidis, 2026. "The Socio‐Cultural and Spiritual Dimensions on Non‐Marketed Environmental Valuation," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(S1), pages 407-426, January.
    14. Nytte, Sharon & Navrud, Ståle & Alfnes, Frode, 2024. "Social acceptance of new floating offshore wind power: Do attitudes towards existing offshore industries matter?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    15. Migena Proi & Emilia Cubero Dudinskaya & Simona Naspetti & Emel Ozturk & Raffaele Zanoli, 2023. "The Role of Eco-Labels in Making Environmentally Friendly Choices: An Eye-Tracking Study on Aquaculture Products with Italian Consumers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, March.
    16. Zhang, Jinlong & Zhang, Wei & E, Jiyue, 2025. "The impact of biodiversity regulation on audit pricing − A quasi-natural experiment based on the Green Shield Program," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    17. Zabala, José A. & Martínez-Paz, José M. & Alcon, Francisco, 2021. "Integrated valuation of semiarid Mediterranean agroecosystem services and disservices," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    18. Trine Kjær & Mickael Bech & Dorte Gyrd‐Hansen & Kristian Hart‐Hansen, 2006. "Ordering effect and price sensitivity in discrete choice experiments: need we worry?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(11), pages 1217-1228, November.
    19. Michael Mies, 2025. "Biodiversity finance: Sovereign biodiversity loss drivers and financial stability," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 29(3), pages 937-954, June.
    20. Haghani, Milad & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Hensher, David A., 2021. "The landscape of econometric discrete choice modelling research," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:5:p:7499-7519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.