IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i5p7363-7377.html

Green Human Resource Management in the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry: Context and Implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Winfred Aina
  • Sachiko Takeda
  • Yumei Yang

Abstract

Research on green human resource management (GHRM) largely emphasises internal drivers, with limited attention to external institutional influences. This study examines how institutional pressures shape the adoption of GHRM practices in Nigeria's oil and gas industry. Semistructured interviews were conducted, drawing on insights from 25 professionals working in the upstream (56%), midstream (36%) and downstream (8%) sectors. Findings reveal that coercive and normative pressures more strongly influence GHRM practices, such as recruitment, training and performance management than mimetic pressures. Evidence of decoupling emerged, with gaps between policy and practice, means and ends, structure and implementation, highlighting discrepancies between formal adoption and substantive enactment. By extending institutional theory to a developing‐country extractive sector, the study underscores the contextual nature of isomorphic pressures and the multilevel manifestations of decoupling, offering fresh insights into how external institutional constraints drive reactive rather than proactive GHRM adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Winfred Aina & Sachiko Takeda & Yumei Yang, 2026. "Green Human Resource Management in the Nigerian Oil and Gas Industry: Context and Implementation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(5), pages 7363-7377, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:5:p:7363-7377
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70553
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70553?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:5:p:7363-7377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.