IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i5p7037-7062.html

Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors as Tools for Improving Market Efficiency: A Study on Equity Misvaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Xinyu Wang
  • Siyu Shen
  • Jun Xie
  • Hidemichi Fujii
  • Alexander Ryota Keeley
  • Shunsuke Managi

Abstract

This study investigated whether superior environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices enhance corporate value and market efficiency under various economic theories. Using a multi‐country panel of 31 economies from 2015 to 2022, we find that both ESG performance and disclosure improve intrinsic value and mitigate equity misvaluation. The results show that performance exerts a stronger effect than disclosure, encouraging managers to prioritize substantive improvements over greenwashing initiatives. Additionally, ESG practices are negatively associated with overvaluation and positively associated with undervaluation, indicating that higher ESG practices can help improve market efficiency. Moreover, the findings suggest that managers allocate more resources to ESG in advanced economies, where the effects are materially stronger than in emerging market and developing economies (EMDEs). Overall, our evidence generalizes beyond single‐country studies and suggests the importance of incorporating ESG information in strategy and decision‐making.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinyu Wang & Siyu Shen & Jun Xie & Hidemichi Fujii & Alexander Ryota Keeley & Shunsuke Managi, 2026. "Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors as Tools for Improving Market Efficiency: A Study on Equity Misvaluation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(5), pages 7037-7062, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:5:p:7037-7062
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70486
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70486?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:5:p:7037-7062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.