IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i4p5955-5972.html

Female Board Representation and Firms' Environmental Performance: A Comparison Between Western and East‐Asian Cultures

Author

Listed:
  • Yuqi Chen
  • Sen Yan
  • Xueying Yu

Abstract

While the global representation of women on boards has steadily increased, regional disparities persist, with Europe leading and East Asia lagging behind. We propose that national culture moderates the impact of female directors on corporate environmental outcomes. Our empirical findings suggest that adding female directors to boards significantly enhances environmental performance in Western economies, whereas this effect is absent in East Asia. Compared to their Western counterparts, female directors in East Asia tend to be younger insiders with limited independence. The lack of independence may compromise their effectiveness. Within this cultural context, we find that only the number of independent female directors is positively associated with firms' environmental performance, particularly among firms in nonmanufacturing industries and those without institutional ownership. This study highlights the interconnectedness of the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) pillars, demonstrating how national culture moderates gender disparities in corporate environmental governance. It also sheds light on ESG strategy design in culturally conservative regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuqi Chen & Sen Yan & Xueying Yu, 2026. "Female Board Representation and Firms' Environmental Performance: A Comparison Between Western and East‐Asian Cultures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 5955-5972, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:4:p:5955-5972
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70451
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70451?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:4:p:5955-5972. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.