IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/bstrat/v35y2026i4p5926-5954.html

Is Circular Also Sustainable? Assessing Circularity and Sustainability to Enhance Legitimacy in Agri‐Food Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Elena Latino
  • Marta Menegoli
  • Maria Laura Giangrande

Abstract

The agri‐food industry faces major sustainability challenges, requiring a shift in companies' approach. Circular economy principles offer a promising path by enhancing resource efficiency, reducing waste, and valorizing by‐products. However, the integration of sustainability and circularity practices remains limited, especially in developing effective, sector‐specific assessment models. This study addresses the gap by proposing a novel self‐assessment framework based on mixed methods, to evaluate sustainability and circularity performance. It combines ESG dimensions with 10 circular R‐strategies, offering a dual‐level assessment. Legitimacy theory underpins the framework, highlighting that firms pursue sustainable and circular practices not only for compliance but also to gain social acceptance. The framework is validated through a multiple case study of three agri‐food firms. Results show that circularity is not always equivalent to sustainability, revealing differing levels of strategy adoption. This research contributes a comprehensive, practical tool to support sustainable innovation and measure circularity in agri‐food.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Elena Latino & Marta Menegoli & Maria Laura Giangrande, 2026. "Is Circular Also Sustainable? Assessing Circularity and Sustainability to Enhance Legitimacy in Agri‐Food Industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 5926-5954, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:4:p:5926-5954
    DOI: 10.1002/bse.70420
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70420
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/bse.70420?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:35:y:2026:i:4:p:5926-5954. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-0836 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.